My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Sustainability Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 04 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
SUSTAINABILITY ADVISORY BOARD
>
2023 Sustainability Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Sustainability Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 04 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2023 2:46:47 PM
Creation date
4/17/2023 2:04:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/19/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Sustainability Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />March 15, 2023 <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />concerning the ordinance but that City Council should act expeditiously so that <br />we can all move onto more impactful actions. <br />Dan noted his general agreement with Megan and Tiffany's viewpoints. <br />Tiffany stated that she would push back on arguments that the ordinance is <br />antibusiness. <br />John stated his approval of the ordinance as written, possibly with some of the <br />recommended amendments. <br />Tiffany inquired about what would help to move the ordinance forward as quickly <br />as possible. Rob replied that the timing really depends on City Council's <br />positions. <br />Tiffany inquired about how the Board could best ask City Council to move the <br />ordinance forward. <br />Lev volunteered that the Board's discussion has largely reflected a false <br />dichotomy and that the Board can recommend a commitment to advancing <br />electric vehicles without taking a position on limiting new gasoline stations. <br />Todd suggested that the Board edit the letter of support to state that the <br />ordinance is not a top priority but that the Board recommends approval with the <br />first and third recommended amendments, cutting the arguments for limiting gas <br />stations to make the letter succinct. <br />Dan stated that he could support such a letter. <br />Tiffany stated that she could support such a letter. <br />John stated his agreement with Tiffany that the Board should not be overly <br />concerned about impacts to businesses since the Board is primarily concerned <br />with environmental sustainability. <br />Todd emphasized that he does not want the Board to always be associated with <br />antibusiness messages. <br />Megan emphasized that there are good motivations for the ordinance based on <br />health and environmental concerns not related to climate change and that the <br />Board should not lose sight of those impacts. <br />Todd asked whether the first recommended amendment is a good idea to <br />recommend to City Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.