My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Sustainability Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 04 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
SUSTAINABILITY ADVISORY BOARD
>
2023 Sustainability Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Sustainability Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 04 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2023 2:46:47 PM
Creation date
4/17/2023 2:04:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/19/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Sustainability Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />March 15, 2023 <br />Page 4 of 10 <br />to slightly decline, age, and become more affluent and that the land currently <br />zoned for residential development could support 350 to 400 new multifamily <br />units. Without land use changes, he stated that Louisville's population is likely to <br />remain steady or decline. <br />John noted the need to factor the growth in use of electric vehicles into <br />considerations of gasoline station demand. He suggested that growth in electric <br />vehicle usage will probably outpace any population growth. He also noted that <br />much of the vehicle traffic in Louisville is nonresident traffic. He also inquired <br />whether the EV fast charger requirement includes any stipulations about the <br />vendors providing such infrastructure. <br />Rob replied that in his experience businesses usually decide on the vendors <br />providing the charging stations. <br />Josh then presented his draft letter of support to City Council. Josh stated that he <br />has not discussed the ordinance in any depth with fellow Board members, so he <br />decided to provide several arguments in favor of the ordinance and several <br />recommended amendments of the ordinance to stimulate the Board's discussion. <br />His arguments fall into three categories: arguments based on the impact on <br />climate change, arguments based on the impact on air, soil, and water pollution, <br />and arguments based on economic sustainability. He also included one <br />argument based on the Sustainability Action's Plans commitments to support <br />local agriculture and food. His first recommended amendment would reduce the <br />cap on the number of gasoline stations to five gasoline stations in the event that <br />the recently approved sixth gasoline station not come to fruition. His second <br />recommended amendment would reduce the cap on the number of gasoline <br />stations by one each time an existing gasoline station closed. His third <br />recommended amendment would eliminate the exception for a seventh gasoline <br />station as part of a marketplace development. <br />Public Comment <br />Steve Anderson, a 40-year resident, former City Council member, and business <br />owner, stated that limiting the allowed types of businesses sends the message to <br />other businesses that they too might lose their ability to do business in Louisville. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.