My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2022 09 27
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2022 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2022 09 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2023 2:51:54 PM
Creation date
5/5/2023 2:21:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/27/2022
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 27, 2022 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />prefers we act with the cohort and not unilaterally. The cost of improvements to vacant <br />buildings would most likely cause those buildings to remain vacant. <br />Iona Kearney, Louisville Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, stated that as a <br />board we are not against the desire for greener infrastructure, but on behalf of some of <br />the membership we have discovered some unanswered questions regarding existing <br />businesses, and the vacant buildings. <br />Mike Deborski, Louisville, stated he attended one of the meetings and was the only <br />business operator in the room. More outreach to businesses may be required. He would <br />like to see more of a "carrot" approach rather than a "hammer" approach. <br />Rick Kron, Louisville DBA and resident, stated he would like to see participation in the <br />cohort and to act with the cohort not before it does, adopt a "carrot" approach. This is a <br />new construction only discussion and should not be applied to existing businesses. <br />Tiffany Boyd, Louisville, encouraged the Council to vote yes and include the energy <br />performance standards. The cohort will bring a lot of municipalities together but <br />Louisville will have a jump start on future standards. <br />Josh Cooperman, Louisville supports the efforts to mitigate climate change and favors <br />the performance standards. This system is used in Boulder. He supports the City's <br />participation in cohort. If Louisville pushes ahead they could inform the cohort. <br />Mayor Stolzmann stated there is an urgency to respond to the climate emergency and <br />the longer we defer and delay the worse it will get. We can't just wait for other people to <br />address the problems. She stated the highest emissions we have are from <br />transportation and building. Xcel will be at 87% carbon free by 2030 and possibly fully <br />carbon free by 2050. The way to address new building is to address building codes. <br />She stated the majority of the comments she has received are based on inaccurate <br />information. She noted that building new buildings with old measures will only cost more <br />to retrofit in the future. She added incentives would be great if we could afford them. <br />Mayor Stolzmann suggested going with Option 1 or 2 with modifications. With option 1 <br />she would like to see an all -electric requirement and for Option 2 to modify the net zero <br />code calculations. She is in favor of adding in all -electric requirements. She is interested <br />to hear what exemptions people would like to see and the details for those. <br />Mayor Stolzmann stated she hears a lot about incentives but they are not really set up <br />to benefit commercial property owners as they are putting out the capital to upgrade and <br />the tenant gets the benefit of a lower energy bill. <br />Councilmember Dickinson stated we have a shared goal as a community, Council, and <br />staff. Our community believes we are in a climate crisis and we have to do something. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.