My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BCBOA Agenda and Packet 2023 05 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2023 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
BCBOA Agenda and Packet 2023 05 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2023 12:58:13 PM
Creation date
6/13/2023 10:33:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/18/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Building Code Board of Appeals <br />Agenda <br />May 18, 2023 <br />Page 13 of 15 <br />Berry asked: Basically, apartments, condos that are being built under the IBC as <br />opposed to the IRC are going to be considered a commercial building. that would <br />mean that the multifamily R-2 would need to meet that performance target of 32. <br />Otherwise the multifamily is a residential building. <br />Berry asked how they will measure performance. Root responded that he did <br />not know how they will measure performance. Berry further read that it's using <br />Energy Star Portfolio manager And adjusted for the percentage of floor area <br />occupied while at least 75% occupied. The building shall operate at or below its <br />energy use target for any recording period of twelve consecutive months that is <br />completed in three years of the date of the C.O. <br />Dino: What we've seen is that between metering and the panels, these have <br />become the most hard to get items in the construction industry. We're regularly <br />seeing years, not months, for lead times. And the more special and stringent it is, <br />the longer it stretches. <br />Geise asked if the board has a city council member that's the board's liaison. <br />Root answered that to his knowledge City Council was not having liaisons since <br />there were so many boards. <br />Geise commented that the board spends so much time and dissecting all this <br />stuff and looking at it and trying to do the right thing for our city and had <br />numerous recommendations on what should be done and city council literally has <br />looked the other way and did whatever they want to do. Geise commented <br />further that if they don't take any recommendations that the board recommends, <br />what is literally the point of this board? <br />Berry recommends that since the monitoring and metering isn't clear how it will <br />be enforced is it responsible of City Council to make it a law. <br />Geise further recommends that the best practice is to let the current code cycle <br />play out first, then look at adoption of that code. <br />Berry summed up what the board would like to achieve with this meeting. Berry <br />would like to work on creating a statement regarding concerns about this <br />ordinance to read during the next City Council meeting. <br />Geise commented that he would like to push this entire ordinance until after the <br />new year. <br />Berry answered that that will not happen because the Mayor will be a County <br />Commissioner by then and she wants to pass it as part of her legacy. That is why <br />it is on the agenda before the end of 2022. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.