Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 05 11

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes April 13, 2023 Page 5 of 12 review uses help meet the fiscal and economic goals of the City by complementing the existing hotel, restaurant, and retail uses nearby. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 8, Series 2023 recommending approval of a General Development Plan Amendment to revise permitted uses for 972 W Dillon Rd in Parcel H of the Centennial Valley General Development Plan, as listed in the Fifth Amended and Restated Development Agreement. Commissioner Questions of Staff: Moline says it seems that a lot of these use requirements and restrictions between some of the parcels were done so that the overall development would have a particular use for different parcels. Is that a correct assumption? Why were these use regulations put on particular sites? Hassan says that is something staff never found conclusive information on. Staff is unsure why there were more use restrictions on Parcel H. Ritchie says you correct though that this GDP does allocate different types of uses throughout the development, generated driven by the expected capacity of the transportation network. And Parcel H is definitely more restricted than other areas; the current owner (Koelbel) doesn't understand the "why" either. Choi asks if staff looked at the property uses and use types in adjacent lots and considered the possible traffic that could be generated by this list of uses and the impacts that would be caused by traffic? Hassan says traffic patterns were not considered when reviewing the application. The uses that are listed in code section 17.072 are commercial and office uses. We discussed these with the applicant and worked with them on these uses and because the size of the property, these uses would not have significant impacts on other commercial zones. Ritchie says we did not require a traffic analysis because there is already retail on the site. Based on other properties, a site of this size already operating a bi higher intensity would not increase traffic. Osterman asks why certain uses would be put in the SRU category and why some would be in the uses -by -right category. Hassan says with those uses permitted by -right, those are based on code section 17.072 commercial and office use table. Those are put into place for other planned commercial zone districts. Staff presumed that along with other similarly zoned properties that are under GDPs, these uses would be allowed by - right. She uses North End as an example. For the SRU's, those were taken out of code section 17.012.030. Howe says according to Title 5, there are limits to medical marijuana licenses. Do you know how many licenses we have granted? He asks if the old marijuana store across McCaslin was within 1500 ft of this property and are they planning to rebuild after the Marshall Fire? Ritchie says the code caps retail marijuana stores at six. The one that was at this site was approved prior to the lottery and is approved prior to the most recent version of the code. The store across the street is subject to the code if they have 22