Laserfiche WebLink
Staff Recommendations for Reducing the Gap Between Revenues and Expenditures <br />Priority Definition... <br />A= Staff recommends taking this action now <br />B= Staff recommends taking this action it <br />C= Consider this action at a later date if necessary <br />D= Staff considered this action and recommends <br />Pro <br />ram Effect <br />well <br />pl <br />;de <br />Action <br />Improved Efficiency <br />Reduced Service <br />Revenue Increase <br />Pros <br />Cons <br />2009 Savings <br />(assuming <br />9/1 start) <br />2010 <br />Annual <br />Ongoing <br />Savings <br />2009 <br />Cumulative <br />Total <br />2010 <br />Cumulative <br />Total <br />1 <br />A <br />FIN <br />Eliminate the Sales Tax Vendor Fee. This would <br />increase total revenue by $120,000 annually, <br />including General Fund revenue of $68,000 for <br />2010, and Conservation Trust Land <br />Acquisition Fund revenue of $34,000 for 2010. <br />Ordinance change and tax form changes would <br />make November 2009 earliest possible <br />implementation date. <br />X <br />City Code authorizes sales tax vendors to <br />withhold 3.33% of the tax they collect, up <br />to a maximum of $100 per month. We <br />can change the current Code via <br />ordinance to eliminate this practice. <br />Council may want to use the funds <br />generated through this change for <br />business assistance activities that might <br />otherwise be cut, however, doing so <br />would not help balance the budget. <br />Some may perceive this as not being <br />"business friendly" during a recessionary <br />period. <br />68,000 <br />68,000 <br />2 <br />A <br />PD <br />Continue to keep one L3 -1 police officer position <br />vacant <br />X <br />Position has been vacant for most of <br />2009 and based upon current loads, <br />services have not been negatively <br />impacted. <br />Less elasticity of scheduling and when <br />call load increases vacancy may result in <br />longer response times. <br />22,000 <br />66,000 <br />22,000 <br />134,000 <br />3 <br />A <br />P &R <br />Create a neighborhood improvement district and <br />transfer responsibility for operating and <br />maintaining Memory Square Pool to the district. <br />X <br />Budget savings: Gross savings of <br />$82,000 offest by loss of admission <br />revenue of $25,000 and Swim Team <br />revenue of $6,500. Based on attendance, <br />the subsidy at Memory Sq. Pool is <br />approximately $10.00 to $12.00 per <br />patron visit. Possibility of making Memory <br />Sq function like the other neighborhood <br />pool (Coal Creek) which is privately <br />operated. Additional capital outlay <br />savings. <br />May reduce access to an important <br />neighborhood amenity. Unknown legal <br />issues and transaction costs. <br />50,500 <br />22,000 <br />184,500 <br />4 <br />A <br />FIN <br />Adjust Annual Replacement Contributions for <br />the Technology Management Fund <br />I.T. has completed their analysis and we <br />have been planning on doing this anyway. <br />Unknown <br />50,000 <br />50,000 <br />72,000 <br />234,500 <br />5 <br />A <br />ALL <br />Pass on to employees that portion of the <br />anticipated 2010 8% medical insurance <br />premium increase that is not offset by the 2009 <br />$37,000 Kaiser refund to the City. If the total <br />increase is 8% (about $75,000 for the General <br />Fund) the General Fund Portion of the refund <br />would be about $25,000, and the net savings to <br />the City would be about $50,000. <br />X <br />The City will most likely have an 8% <br />benefit increase for 2010. Currently, the <br />City's salaries are competitive while <br />medical benefits are more generous than <br />other jurusdictions. Having employees <br />instead of the City absorb this increase <br />will bring Louisivlle's benefits package <br />more in line with comparable cities. Using <br />the Kaiser refund to minimize the cost <br />increase to employees demonstrates the <br />City's partnership with employees in <br />promoting wellness and reducing health <br />insurance costs. <br />This is not a true savings (but it is an <br />avoided cost increase, and the cost <br />increase in reflected in our long -term <br />projections). Passing the cost on to <br />employees Imposes more of a burden on <br />employees.There would be a <br />disproportionate impact on employees at <br />the lower end of the pay scales. <br />50,000 <br />72,000 <br />284,500 <br />Budget Options 2009 08 05.xls <br />Page 1 of 12 <br />