Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COAL CREEK STATION <br />CONT'D <br /> <br />He stated that the plans and speci- <br />fications required by the City have <br />been submitted and that the development <br />would be under the existing zoning. <br />He also stated the plans for the area <br />would be partly development and the <br />other sold. <br />Mr. Brock noted that discussion was <br />held with the State Geological Survey <br />and still in progress regarding the <br />undermining located in the area <br />proposed for development. <br />Resolution #5 was read by Mr. Wurl <br />approving the Coal Creek Station Pre- <br />liminary P.U.D. plan subject to noted <br />corrections. <br />Councilman DelPizzo asked about the <br />number of streets as the plan showed <br />only one. <br />Mr. Brock stated that the one street <br />noted on the map was the only street <br />planned. <br /> <br />Councilman Caranci asked who scheduled <br />the public hearing for the plan, as <br />he knew nothing about the proposed <br />plans. <br />Mr. Wurl stated that in the Ordinance <br />governing procedures for P.U.D. 's it <br />states this order for the hearing. It <br />was noted that the planned hearing was <br />a preliminary hearing. <br />Councilman Caranci asked how long the <br />Planning Commission had worked on <br />the project. It was stated that the <br />Board discussed the proposal and <br />studied the plans at three meetings. <br />Council was informed that the pre- <br />liminary hearing was not final approval <br />on the proposed development and any <br />changes could be discussed and decided <br />upon prior to the final approval. <br />After discussion Councilman McDonald <br />moved that Resolution #5, Series 1976, <br />be adopted. Seconded by Councilman <br />DiCarlo. Mayor Waschak opened the <br />public hearing. <br />Mrs. Shipton asked if the City had an <br />ordinance which requires an establish- <br />ment to have sanitary facilities and <br />to run clean establishments. <br />Mr. Wurl stated that there was such a <br />coding. <br /> <br />-2- <br />