My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 07 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2023 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 07 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2023 11:19:31 AM
Creation date
7/26/2023 10:48:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
7/17/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />8. Probable Cause Public Hearing <br />816 McKinley <br />Brackett Hogstad presented on 816 McKinley showing the property location and <br />discussing past historic conditions. She noted that the property was already <br />landmarked (in 2010) and received a grant, but not a Historic Structure <br />Assessment grant. She suggested that based on the language in Resolution No. <br />17, Series 2019, the applicants were eligible for an HSA assessment grant. In <br />addition, philosophically, the HPC decided in 2019 that if a property was <br />previously landmarked or received a grant, there is still a good benefit to the City <br />that the assessment be done. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends that the HPC make a finding of Probable Cause, making the <br />property at 816 McKinley eligible for a Historic Structure Assessment grant not to <br />exceed $4,000 to reimburse the costs of the HSA. <br />Commissioner Questions of Staff. <br />Dunlap asked for clarification about whether an HSA was previously done. <br />Brackett Hogstad stated that an HSA had not been completed. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Andy Johnson, DAJ Design, made comments representing the applicants. He <br />mentioned an interesting social history and suggested there seems to be some <br />contradictory information that the HSA might help elucidate. <br />Johnson said that the property associated with 301 Spruce. In the 1930s, the <br />lots were sold separately and the house was "moved." Notably, stone rubble <br />debris indicates that the home is likely older than 1930s. It may have been built <br />after 301 Spruce, Johnson believes it did not move, nor does he believe that it <br />was originally a carriage house (he is guessing it was a guest house). <br />Furthermore, he noted that the house is not "Greek revival" architecture, and it <br />seems to be originally two stories, with two chimneys (one has since been <br />removed) and the interior has been redone. The fact that the home was built with <br />two chimneys bolsters the case that this was not a carriage home. <br />Johnson noted that 612 Grant was approved for Probable Cause, post- <br />landmarking, for a very similar situation. Also, there are two chimneys — one <br />removed, but this strengthens his case for it not being a carriage house. <br />Kevin and Jenny Eld, applicants, said they are new Louisville residents and <br />were drawn to Old Town due to the rich history. Recently a neighbor gave them <br />an album of photos associated with the house. <br />Commissioner Questions of Applicant: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.