My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 09 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2023 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 09 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 12:33:39 PM
Creation date
9/6/2023 12:21:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/13/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />August 9, 2023 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />land, it should create a memo about recommending it. Ember added that city staff members <br />would not engage with the process, unless OSAB gave the green light to go forward. <br />Laura said she liked the land. It provides a buffer to the trail, it has tall cottonwood trees, and it <br />is adjacent to a ditch. She added that while the parcel is very small, most future acquisitions in <br />the city are likely to be small slivers, as large parcels are rare and expensive. She is interested <br />in having the land conserved, possibly as a fee simple acquisition. <br />Susan said that she was also in favor and felt some urgency about moving quickly. <br />Ember said that staff preliminary research revealed that the parcel may have been donated or <br />sold to Habitat for Humanity for affordable housing. <br />David asked about the potential for a conservation easement on the parcel. Jessamine thought <br />it probably already had a set back on it. She added that a trail setback might be a good way to <br />satisfy the goals of the board. <br />Michiko asked if it was possible for the city to trade the property for a different one so the goal of <br />affordable housing could still be met. David cautioned that OSAB should only discuss this <br />particular parcel. Michiko thought it was a good piece of land for buffering and connectivity. <br />She added that she felt it was not a safe place to build housing. <br />Jojo expressed support for the land for Open Space, though they also care about the issue of <br />affordable housing. Several other board members echoed a general concern about affordable <br />housing in Louisville. <br />The board was unanimous in supporting the idea that the city explore the potential of the parcel <br />for Open Space. The board is interested in exploring a range of possibilities, including fee <br />simple acquisition, conservation easements, and trail setback. <br />Susan volunteered to write a memo and Ember said she would send it to the City Manager and <br />then on to Council. <br />6. Field Tour to Potential Open Space Candidate Parcels. Opportunities for <br />Preserving Open Space and Improving Trail Connectivity. <br />The Open Space Advisory Board drove together in a van to the parcels listed in the Meeting <br />Packet. When safe, the board got out of the van and discussed the parcels. Inside the van, no <br />discussion could take place, due to open meeting rules. Each board member ranked each <br />parcel on a spreadsheet, according to three metrics of Natural Resource Value, User <br />Experience Value, and Strategic Value, and will supply their completed spreadsheet to Ember <br />no later than noon on August 16. These spreadsheets will be combined and discussed at a <br />future OSAB meeting, either September or October, at which point the resulting documentation <br />will be made public record. <br />7. Adjourn <br />The meeting adjourned at 8:57 pm. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.