My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 09 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2023 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 09 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2023 12:33:39 PM
Creation date
9/6/2023 12:21:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/13/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C140 Louisville <br />PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPACE <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: Open Space Advisory Board <br />From: Acquisition Tiger Team, Laura Scott Denton and Michiko <br />Christiansen <br />Date: September 13, 2023 <br />Re: Discussion Item 9: Review and Finalize Results of the 2023 <br />OSAB Potential Open Space Candidate Recommendations <br />to City Council <br />Included is the 2023 spreadsheet with the results of our driving tour evaluation. Staff used our <br />individual evaluations to calculate an average of each property's value rankings and provided a range of <br />the values reported. They calculated a sum of the three average values and sorted the list from the <br />highest sum to the lowest sum. I compiled comments and goals from what board members wrote on <br />their individual evaluation spreadsheets. <br />Note that the map is from our previous year's evaluation. It will be updated after our meeting. <br />At the September meeting, we will be sorting all the properties into three categories. To try to simplify <br />communication with Council, Michiko and I have decided on the following categories, though they can <br />be further refined at the meeting: <br />--HIGH PRIORITY FOR OPEN SPACE <br />--POSSIBLE CANDIDATE FOR OPEN SPACE <br />--CONSIDERED, BUT NOT A PRIORITY FOR OPEN SPACE AT THIS TIME (This last category can include <br />properties that we like for other purposes, like parks or dog parks.) <br />If you wrote notes on your individual property sheets, please bring them to help with our <br />discussion. We are going to try to come up with a 1st & 2nd goal statement for each property. Some of <br />these will go quickly as there was generally good consensus among board members, and others will <br />require more discussion. Please look at the "possible goals" column from the evaluation spreadsheet to <br />get a sense of what your colleagues are thinking for each parcel and come ready to be decisive <br />(hopefully!). <br />Ember and staff are going to try to give us a little more information about conservation easement status <br />for some of these properties, especially those at the top of the ranking. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.