My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2023 09 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2023 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2023 09 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2023 9:34:48 AM
Creation date
11/22/2023 9:31:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/20/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 19, 2023 <br />Page 10 of 11 <br />Zuccaro begins his presentation by showing an aerial image for the <br />Drainageway. This is part of the Goodhue Ditch and this is to replace a culvert. <br />He discusses what a floodplain permit is and what the floodplain zone is. On a <br />map, he shows the 100-year floodplain and the 500-year floodplain. <br />He then shows an image of the construction documents. He discusses the <br />pathways of the drainage and how that relates to the elevation. LMC Section <br />17.56.164 is discussed and says that an alteration of watercourse allows <br />alternation of the watercourse subject to a CLOMR (Conditional Letter of Map <br />Revision). Section 17.56.210 discusses the floodplain development permit <br />procedures. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff finds that the request meets municipal code standards and recommends <br />approval. <br />Board Questions of Staff. <br />Berger says you mentioned that there may be some areas that would be more <br />impacted by flooding. Can you speak more on that? <br />Zuccaro says within the floodplain report, there is a table. The existing flood <br />elevation is 79.36 and after the culvert, there is an increase in elevation. Mapping <br />that out in the topography, you can actually see the elevation going up and where <br />that expands on the property. It is a pretty minimal expansion. <br />Hawksley asks if this change will trigger re -assessment rates for homeowner <br />insurances that back to this. <br />Zuccaro says the insurance requirement only comes into play if it is affecting the <br />structure itself. As long as the new flood map and new elevation is not hitting that <br />structure. Flood insurance is only required if the floodplain is affecting the <br />structure. <br />Hawksley mentions his concern about homeowners receiving an increase <br />insurance rate on their floodplain insurance and wonders the implication of <br />approving this. <br />Cooper mentions that her property touches the 500-year floodplain and she is <br />not impacted structurally. <br />Sommer asks if there are other floodplain maps not adopted by a government <br />entity. <br />Zuccaro says our floodplain maps were all updated in 2019 so they are all very <br />current. He speaks more on flood insurance. There is nothing in the code about <br />flood insurance. We see it as a benefit to remove structures from the floodplain <br />since it eliminates risk. We do not require them to get insurance though. <br />Hawksley mentions that there is one property that is in floodplain that was not <br />before. <br />Cooper says though that it is not a requirement to get floodplain insurance. <br />Berger asks the number of properties that are in the floodplain and how that <br />number would change after this adoption. <br />Zuccaro says he does not know that number. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.