Laserfiche WebLink
3) Association with a notable person <br />or the work of a notable person. <br />Single-family ownership for <br />over 75 years, in the <br />Ross/Marino family (starting in <br />1951) <br />o Still owned by Marino <br />family <br />• See attached Social History <br />Report for detailed information. <br />1. c. Geographic%nvironmental. <br />Yes <br />The historic location of the house helps <br />1) Enhances sense of identity of the <br />to create a sense of neighborhood <br />community. <br />identity. <br />2) An established and familiar <br />natural setting or visual feature <br />that is culturally significant to the <br />history of Louisville. <br />3. All properties will be evaluated for <br />Yes <br />The structure remains in its original <br />physical integrity and shall meet one <br />location and has not been moved. The <br />or more of the following criteria: <br />property has integrity of location, <br />a. Shows character, interest or <br />setting, feeling and association. <br />value as part of the development, <br />heritage or cultural characteristics <br />of the community, region, state, <br />The house is currently compromised <br />or nation. <br />by the window resizing, the siding, and <br />b. Retains original design features, <br />front porch. However, the overall form <br />materials and/or character. <br />remains, and the proposed changes to <br />c. Remains in its original location, <br />the front porch would help enhance <br />has the same historic context <br />the structure's architectural integrity. <br />after having been moved, or was <br />moved more than 50 years ago. <br />d. Has been accurately <br />reconstructed or restored based <br />on historic documentation. <br />ALTERATION CERTIFICATE CRITERIA AND STANDARDS ANALYSIS: <br />Sec. 15.36.120. - Criteria to review an Alteration Certificate. <br />A. The commission shall issue an Alteration Certificate for any proposed work on a <br />designated historical site or district only if the proposed work would not detrimentally alter, <br />destroy or adversely affect any architectural or landscape feature which contributes to its <br />original historical designation. <br />B. The commission must find the proposed alteration to be visually compatible with <br />designated historic structures located on the property in terms of design, finish, material, scale, <br />mass and height. When the subject site is in an historic district, the commission must also find <br />that the proposed alteration is visually compatible with characteristics that define the district. For <br />the purposes of this chapter, the term "compatible" shall mean consistent with, harmonious with, <br />or enhancing to the mixture of complementary architectural styles, either of the architecture of <br />an individual structure or the character of the surrounding structures. <br />