Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 11 09

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 14, 2023 Page 13 of 14 the applicant, like condoized air space, or fee -simple lots, but these would face similar constraints inherent to the density. Brauneis expressed his concern that the development would be in the mold of an outdated, suburban approach, where the developer squeezed as many units onto the one cul-de-sac as possible. He questioned whether this was the best way to achieve greater density. Zuccaro deferred to the applicant, but noted that this was not how staff approached the application. He suggested that this would be a good discussion to have with the applicant. Staff liked the mix of housing types as part of the development. Zuccaro displayed LMC 17.28.110 waiver criteria on screen. He suggested that the Planning Commission should discuss the planned open space, and whether it would usable and functional, and whether it would provide for the needs of the residents. Krantz asked if there were discussions about safe routes for children to get school. Hassan said that sidewalks on East Street would connect with the private drive. She said she would check with the BVSD on current school bus routes. Howe asked about the refined trail that runs north south on the west side of Highway 42. Zuccaro said that the trail ended at the south side of the property and merged into the sidewalk. He said that the City would consider options for extending the trail as part of the Highway 42 plan. Applicant Presentation and Commissioner Questions of Applicant: Andy Johnson, DAJ Design, resident, presented the East Street Village proposal. He noted that plans were further along than they might typically be for a preliminary plat and PUD. He said they were therefore able to have more detailed discussion at this stage if desired. Johnson noted that the site was near downtown, and within the context of the zoning map, the site is right next to downtown Commercial Core (CC). The site was predominantly within the RM zoning district. He added that while the property was not within the downtown core, it was directly adjacent to it. He also mentioned the similarities of this development with the Clementine and Sunnyside developments as a point of comparison. He also noted the presence of a sewer easement on the site. Johnson explained the historic context of the structures on the site, noting that many of the units were rentals that had been there for decades. Johnson described the scope of the project, noting that it was similar to Clementine, but was unique in a few ways. East St Village would have a blend of housing types and varying floor plans, unlike Clementine. They were aiming for an articulated skyline rather than straight wall of building. He noted that in accordance with the comprehensive plan, the project would consist of smaller blocks, and would be walkable to downtown Louisville. He argued that this would be a relatively small housing development, and noted City of Louisville Community Development 749 Main Street Louisville CO 80027 303.335.4592 www.LouisvilleCO.gov