My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 11 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2023 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 11 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2023 1:15:16 PM
Creation date
11/22/2023 10:32:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
11/9/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Cityof <br />Louisville <br />COLORADO • SINCE 1878 <br />Johnson said that the applicant had conducted extensive consultation with neighbors <br />and stakeholders. The main concerns raised regarded the impact of new housing on <br />businesses on the northern side of the site. He also addressed the City's housing needs <br />assessment, and noted that it was difficult to find sites for new development in Louisville. <br />He also said that it was difficult to incorporate the 12% affordable housing requirement <br />into a development this small. <br />Paul Norquist, nonresident, from Design Practice, addressed the waivers that were <br />requested by the applicant, and why they were necessary. He also showed the proposed <br />designs and sizes of the residential units. <br />Bobby Steer, nonresident, from GSC Capital, addressed the letter the applicant sent to <br />the Commission regarding the proposed City Ordinance on Accessory Dwelling Units <br />(ADUs). He noted that the garages of the townhomes could be converted into ADUs <br />should the ordinance be approved. <br />Commissioner Questions of Applicant: <br />Baskett asked about the size of the backyards for both unit types. Norquist said that <br />depth ranges from around 12ft to 24ft. Zuccaro added that staff could do the calculations. <br />Baskett asked how the applicant envisioned residents using the spaces between the <br />townhomes and garages. Norquist said that it would be up to the residents, but it could <br />be used as a garden, sitting area, or vegetable patch, for example. Baskett added that <br />she appreciated the north to south orientation of the open space, and she thought that <br />the configuration would be very usable. Norquist noted that the orientation was based on <br />the efficiency of the chosen layout. <br />Hassan shared the backyard measurements with the Commissioners. <br />Choi asked about the outreach process the applicant used, and how this outreach <br />changed their plans. He was particularly interested in their outreach to the Fire <br />Department. Johnson said that the drive aisles were enlarged by aft after discussion with <br />the Fire Marshall, so that the turning radii of the fire trucks could be accommodated. <br />Choi asked whether the conversation with the Fire Department also covered the layout <br />of the individual units. Johnson said that the discussion was primarily around access. <br />Choi also asked about the positioning of the fire hydrants. Johnson said their positioning <br />was advised by the Fire Department. <br />Osterman asked whether the street would be two-way. Norquist said the width would be <br />similar to a wide alley or parking lot. As such it would be two-way, but with limited space. <br />Moline asked what demographic the applicant intended to market the development to. <br />Steer said they intended to market it to local residents. <br />Howe questioned whether the applicant intended to use the fee -in -lieu option for <br />affordable housing. Norquist said that including "like kind" affordable units would not be <br />viable. <br />Howe asked about the importance of the modification waivers to the project, and whether <br />reducing the density would make the waivers unnecessary. Johnson said that less density <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.