My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2023 11 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2023 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2023 11 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2024 2:35:54 PM
Creation date
12/6/2023 10:54:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
11/6/2023
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9E1
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 21, 2023 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />Public Comments <br />Katie Lacz, urged a yes vote both for a climate change perspective and public health <br />perspective. She stated the people she knows want the community to be a leader in <br />climate change and support this ordinance. <br />RJ Harrington, Louisville, stated he owns a business and as a business owner he <br />supports the move away from fossil fuel infrastructure. Any new fuel station incents the <br />use of fossil fuels. He stated that installing charging stations is the best way to support <br />people in town. <br />Tamar Krantz, Louisville, stated the state tracks petroleum release events and many <br />come from gas stations. Not allowing stations will help prevent contamination. <br />Cathern Smith, Louisville, stated we are faced with a large problem and we alone can't <br />solve it, but this is one way make a small change here in Louisville. She does not <br />support the exception for a marketplace location. <br />Councilmember Hamlington stated she believes the community members and <br />businesses all have a shared goal of creating an economically successful and <br />sustainable future. While we may not agree on what that path looks like, this ordinance <br />is step in the right direction. The ordinance is a good compromise, it is a cap not a ban, <br />it does not punish current fuel station owners, but it does recognize that the longevity of <br />new stations is a reasonable question. She stated this is a step in the right direction to <br />meet our carbon goals. <br />Mayor Maloney stated the Council needs to be thoughtful with changes to our <br />ordinances and not create unintended impacts. He noted everyone on Council supports <br />our sustainability goals. We can't solve the climate crisis but we can be a part of a <br />solution. People will be driving gas cars for years to come simply because the transition <br />will take some time. He supports the ordinance but worries it will preclude any future <br />changes in the industry that might allow for different types of fueling stations such as <br />hydrogen. He doesn't want to create something that won't be adaptable to future <br />technology, but that will have to wait for a future discussion. <br />Councilmember Most agreed people will be using cars for a long time and will rely on <br />gas, but she wants to move something forward now even if we have to change it later to <br />adapt to future technology. <br />Councilmember Leh stated he didn't support the moratorium only because he did not <br />like the process that preceded the vote. However, he agrees everyone wants a vibrant, <br />sustainable community. He stated there are many values to balance here, what the <br />community want, market forces, and more, but this ordinance balances those. He stated <br />he supports the ordinance. <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.