Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ADJOURNED MEETING <br /> <br />LOUISVILLE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 11, 1974 <br /> <br />Mayor Waschak called the adjourned meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. with <br />the following Council members present: Berry, Scholl, Dhieux, DelPizzo, <br />and DiCarlo. Mayor Waschak informed Council that Councilman Domenico <br />would be in later. <br /> <br />L.U.R.A. <br /> <br />City Engineer White informed Council that <br />LURA was being replaced by the Louisville <br />Coummunity Development Act as of January, <br />1975. He stated that the City needs to <br />decide the best way to handle the change. <br />A memo written by Mr. Wurl was read. It <br />stated two alternatives. One: To <br />retain LURA as presently structured and <br />contract with them for Urban Renewal <br />functions. Two: Incorporate LURA into <br />City operating under the guidelines he <br />had stated in the memo. <br /> <br />Mr. Wurls recommendation to Council was <br />to accept option #2 which was identified <br />as option B in the memo. <br /> <br />Engineer White stated that he had spoken <br />with Mr. David Chenoweth who did not have <br />any other alternatives and agreed with the <br />suggestions Mr. Wurl had made. <br /> <br />Mr. Chenoweth stated that an attorneys <br />opinion was needed to see if there should <br />be a separate entity. He felt that the <br />attorney should review the options before <br />any action was taken. <br /> <br />Councilman Berry stated that he did approve <br />the general board guidelines were agreeable <br />and that he did approve of option #2. <br />Councilwoman Dhieux stated that she too <br />agreed and felt the guidleline were accept- <br />able. She also felt that it be thoroughly <br />reviewed by Attorney Morris as not to <br />jeopardize any federal funding. <br />Councilman DiCarlo stated that he felt <br />option #2 should be adopted pending the <br />attorneys decisions. <br /> <br />Councilwoman Dhieux asked Mr. Chenoweth <br />about the lower pay that the City has <br />and if there was any disapproval on this <br />matter. Mr. Chenoweth stated that he <br />did disapprove because there was nothing <br />stated on the pay scale for the type of <br />work that it totally involved for the <br />members of the staff. <br />