My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2000 05 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2000-2009 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2000 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2000 05 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:01:58 PM
Creation date
10/1/2009 4:50:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
5/2/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
5A6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2000 05 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Louisville City Council Meeting <br />April 4, 2000 <br />Page 17. <br /> <br />Sisk voiced his concern over Council approving the lots and with the Peak to Peak <br />School circumventing the planning and permit processes. He stated his concern was that <br />by approving this proposal, Council would be approving the school, after which the <br />City's only recourse would be a court action. <br /> <br />Brown asked Light, if the school went forward on their intent without any discussion or <br />review use, and the City take a negative position, would this ultimately require court <br />action. <br /> <br />Light stated that Council approval on the PUD Development Plan is not subject to the <br />usage. He noted that a school within an industrial area would require a Special Review <br />Use. <br /> <br />MOTION: Davidson moved that Resolution No. 23, Final PUD CTC 1st Filing be tabled <br />to the July 18,2000 City Council meeting, second Sisko <br /> <br />Brown stated his concern that by tabling the issue, Council then makes a decision to <br />delay the plans of the school. However, the issue of a school being in a place that may <br />not be appropriate, and the State imposing the issue, caused Brown concern. He stated <br />~ that he would prefer to openly deal with the challenges and concerns that this particular <br />use creates. <br /> <br />Davidson moved to amend the motion that this item could be moved forward from July <br />18, 2000, if Council so desired. <br /> <br />Light added to an earlier meeting upon establishment of proper public notice. <br /> <br />The amendment was acceptable to the second. <br /> <br />Roll call vote was taken. The motion carried by a vote of 5-1, with Keany voting no. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 24, SERIES 2000 - FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br />AND SPECIAL REVIEW USE TO AUTHORIZE A 5-UNIT TOWNHOUSE <br />PROJECT, 1502-1512 MAIN STREET <br /> <br />Howard returned to the meeting at 9:09 p.m. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Staff presentation. <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.