Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Louisville City Council Meeting <br />November 19,2002 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />C. Approval WASH IGroup Intergovernmental Agreementfor EPA & <br />CDPHE Storm Water Phase II Regulations <br />D. Approval of Highway 42/96th Street Project, Colorado Department of <br />Transportation (CDOT) Land Exchange <br />E. Award Bidfor the' North Water Treatment Plant Roof to Arapahoe <br />Roofing <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA <br /> <br />Frosty Woolridge, 1458 Ford Place, Louisville, CO, congratulated Council member <br />Mayer as the new Boulder County Commissioner. He addressed the world <br />overpopulation problem and offered to make a presentation at a City Council work <br />session. He requested that Counc:il discuss the issue and adopt a resolution that would <br />help stabilize the world population. <br /> <br />Bridget Bacon, 195 S. Washington Avenue, Louisville, CO, asked Council to proceed <br />with an option or first right of refusal on the post office building as a future site for <br />Louisville Library. She stated the needs assessment established the desires ofthe <br />community. She emphasized that residents have requested a new library for many years <br />and that City Council requires the Library to remain downtown. She stated the purchase <br />of the post office property would provide amble same for the new library and ensure the <br />Library would remain downtown. <br /> <br />Mayer arrived at the meeting at 7:09 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS ON PERTINENT ITEMS NOT ON <br />THE AGENDA <br /> <br />Brown addressed the election voter survey for Louisville ballot issues. He noted the <br />desires of the citizens of Louisville were clearly expressed by the failure of ballot issues <br />2A and 2B. He explained that Council investigated proceeding with a poll or survey to <br />determine a direction for the future. <br /> <br />Van Pelt suggested that Council take a pro-active role in planning for the future. She felt <br />a poll at this time would be retrospective and Council should determine what course to <br />take in the future. She voiced her preference to wait on a poll until next spring. <br /> <br />Sisk stated the community must come together, and a survey at this point would be <br />premature. He suggested a survey be conducted in April or May and Council reevaluate <br />the issues before next November. He noted with the current budget constraints, the <br />purchase of the Post Office prope:rty might not be possible and it would be unfair to make <br />promises to the residents. <br /> <br />Keany concurred with Council comments and suggested that Council review the fees at <br />the recreation center. <br /> <br />2 <br />