City Council Agenda and Packet 1998 09 01

Home Browse Search

Howard agreed with Lathrop. He repeated his statement from the neighborhood meeting that the City' must also be financially prudent as well as meet the needs of all the citizens. He feels the only alternative that truly preserves Lak:e Park and meets the needs of the residents at a considerably moderate cost is proposed alternative `C'. Lathrop stated that the location of the bike/pedestrian path has also been a topic for discussion. He feels the best location for the path is on top of the berm. This would allow the sun to melt any ice or snow that builds up on the path. Lathrop moved that Council authorize staff to complete the Lake Park Drainage Way `A' project utilizing alternative `C'; that Council specifically cover improvements to Lake Park in the 1999 budget considerations; and that the bike/pedestrian trail be either at the top of the berm, or close to the top, for maximum sun exposure„ seconded by Levihn. Davidson offered an amendment that the specific location of the trail be determined by the Parks and Recreation Department, not accepted by Lathrop. Lathrop offered a friendly amendment that the bike/pedestrian trail be moved as close to the top of the berm as possible, accepted by Le;vihn. Davidson offered a friendly amendment that Council authorize a change order of the contract in the amount of $ 114,229, accepted by Lathrop and Levihn. boll call was taken. Motion passed by a 6-1 vote, with Mayer voting against. RESOLUTION No. 37, SERIES 1998 -FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR LOT 3 AND A REPEAT OF LOTS 3 & 4 OF COAL CREEK MEDICAL CAMPUS (continued from 7/2I/98) Davidson stated that Resolution No. 37, Series 1998 was tabled after a motion was made and seconded; therefore, Council would need to either withdraw the motion or amend it with any changes made at this meeting. Davidson called for staff introduction. Paul Wood, Planning Director, explained that Resolution No. 37, Series 1998, was tabled at the July 21, 1998, City Council meeting to resolve several issues discussed at that meeting. The revised Resolution reflects all conditions as proposed and seconded in the motion that was tabled on July 21. The applicant submitted a response lettex dated July 27, 1998, that states their position on the items in the current Resolution. The outstanding issues are: