My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1998 08 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1998 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1998 08 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:01:57 PM
Creation date
10/22/2009 11:54:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
8/18/1998
Original Hardcopy Storage
5A2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1998 08 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Approval of Minutes (6/16/98) <br />Approval of Bills <br /> <br />P'UBLIC COMMENTS <br /> <br />Davidson asked to make a quick statement regarding prairie dogs to those in attendance. He stated <br />that there is no deadline for the removal of prairie dogs nor has there ever been a deadline. He has <br />received letters stating that the prairie dogs are being removed to develop the land, or to landscape <br />the land, and both statements are untrue. He replied that the prairie dogs are being removed from the <br />area because it is unsuitable for them. A prairie dog colony requires up to five square miles to be <br />self-sustaining; therefore, they are be:ing moved to an area where they have a chance to survive. <br />Prairie dogs in urban environments are: under constant stress, very susceptible to disease, and would <br />eventually die out because of that or from consuming the limited food source and then starving to <br />death. It has been said that on City-ovvned property at the fire station, a prairie dog was poisoned; <br />however, the City does not own that property. The City has been identified as poisoning prmrie dogs <br />on the open space at Hwy 42 and South Boulder Road. That area is county property, not City <br />property. In both cases, it is private property. As a statutory City, Louisville does not have the <br />authority to regulate prairie dogs on private property. The City's policy is to relocate the prairie dogs <br />to an area where they have a chance to survive. A contractor is in the process of relocating them and <br />will continue until they are all relocatled. <br /> <br />Davidson called for public comments on items not on the agenda. <br /> <br />Steve Lowe, 651 W. Sandbar Circle, Louisville, Colorado, stated that many of his questions were <br />answered by Davidson's statement regarding prairie dogs. He asked that Council consider planting <br />native grasses or trees along Via Appia after the prairie dogs have been relocated. <br /> <br />Frosty Wooldridge, 1548 Ford Place, Louisville, Colorado, read a letter to Council asking that they <br />take the ecosystem into consideration when making decisions involving development, open space, <br />etc., and vote to preserve wildlife. <br /> <br />Keany arrived at 7:08 p.m. <br /> <br />Annelise Cummings, 795 W. Pinyon Way, Louisville, Colorado, stated she disagreed with <br />Davidson's earlier statement that the prairie dogs are not being relocated for landscaping purposes. <br />She asked to read a statement contained in a letter she received from Steve Baysinger, Director of <br />Parks and Recreation, which stated "plans to upgrade landscaping the hillside on Via Appia have <br />driven the need for relocation of the prairie dogs at that site." <br /> <br />Davidson replied that, as the Mayor, he could assure her that Mr. Baysinger's statement was <br />incorrect and apologized for the error.. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.