My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1997 01 14
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1997 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1997 01 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:01:54 PM
Creation date
11/12/2009 9:54:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
1/14/1997
Original Hardcopy Storage
5A1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1997 01 14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CML Legislative <br />Workshop <br />Don't forget to register <br />for the CML Legislative <br />Workshop scheduled for <br />Thursday, Jan. 30, 1997. <br />For more on the work- <br />shop, see page 11, and <br />look for registration <br />details in future issues of <br />Statehouse Report and <br />the CML Newsletter. <br />CML's Growth Committee, chaired by <br />Glenwood Springs Councilmember Lou <br />Trapini, continues to study this issue to <br />help determine what the municipal pos- <br />ture on takings and other land use items <br />should be in 1997. <br />Rep. Bob Hagedorn, D- Aurora, will <br />likely reintroduce a version of his HB <br />96 -1124, which would have required <br />local governments to submit to a media- <br />tion process whenever a regulation "dis- <br />proportionately affects" someone's prop- <br />erty. CML opposed his measure (taken <br />generally from a recently- enacted <br />Florida law) on the grounds that it <br />imposed numerous unfunded procedural <br />mandates on local governments in con- <br />nection with the process set forth in the <br />bill. It was killed on second reading on <br />the House floor. <br />At a minimum, municipal officials are <br />encouraged to remind legislators about <br />the importance of local control over land <br />use policies. What is essential for city <br />and town officials is to forge solid lines <br />of communication and a sense of trust <br />with legislators on land use issues. <br />Please keep League staff posted on <br />potential land use disputes or controver- <br />sies in your own community. <br />Tax policy <br />Will there be tax reform, tax relief, or <br />both? Expect to see Rep. Larry Schwarz, <br />R- Wetmore, reintroduce his legislation <br />exempting certain valuations from the <br />personal property tax. Others may <br />follow suit. This move will be strongly <br />supported by the Colorado Association <br />of Commerce and Industry (CACI) and <br />the National Federation of Independent. <br />Businesses (NFIB). <br />Unclear to local officials is how the lost <br />revenue will be made up. This is what <br />caused the governor to veto the bill last <br />session at the request of local govern- <br />ment interests, including CML. <br />In the area of tax reform, there may be <br />legislative attempts to try to develop a <br />tax policy study. Feeley championed <br />this cause in 1996. Senate President <br />Norton may introduce legislation setting <br />up a tax data collection effort at the <br />state and local level. Sen. Ben <br />Alexander, R- Montrose, may attempt to <br />eliminate the reliance upon the property, <br />tax and substitute other revenue sources <br />for it. <br />Finally, expect to see taxation of posses- <br />sory interests and agricultural property <br />assessments surface again during the <br />session. <br />School construction needs <br />A big part of the school finance debate <br />in 1997 will be whether the Legislature <br />should establish a program, to aid school <br />districts with their construction and <br />facility needs, estimated to exceed $2.5 <br />billion over the next several years. <br />Lawmakers are still divided over <br />whether this is an appropriate area for <br />state funding in the School Finance Act <br />and whether local school districts should <br />be left to sort out this issue locally. The <br />vast majority of school districts with <br />such bond issues on the Nov. 5 ballot <br />passed. <br />House Majority Leader Anderson and <br />Sen. Joan Johnson, D- Thornton, will <br />carry a constitutional amendment to <br />redirect lottery proceeds away from <br />GOCO and local governments (via a <br />reduction in the Conservation Trust <br />Fund shareback) into a new grant pro- <br />gram for school capital needs. CML will <br />strongly oppose this measure. <br />It is unclear just how much support <br />there is, if any, for this amendment <br />within the school finance lobby. <br />It will take a two- thirds vote of the Leg- <br />islature to place this on the ballot. <br />Electric deregulation <br />Rep. Paul Schauer, R- Littleton, will be <br />carrying legislation again to restructure <br />certain aspects of the electric utility <br />industry. A bill he carried last session <br />died in his own House committee. A <br />coalition of utility and consumer inter- <br />ests opposed the legislation, as well as <br />CML. This is also an issue at the federal <br />level, championed mainly by Con- <br />4 CML Statehouse Report December 6, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.