Laserfiche WebLink
sition team to develop the preliminary <br />guidelines for the public purchasing <br />cooperative and to assist in drafting leg- <br />islation. The primary purpose for the <br />cooperative is to offer high quality <br />health care at affordable prices to all <br />public entities across the state. The <br />cooperative is officially being called <br />Public Employers Group Insurance. <br />The final legislation is not drafted at this <br />point, but the guidelines set forth for the <br />purchasing cooperative are favorable to <br />municipalities. Municipal participation <br />would be voluntary, and flexibility <br />would be provided on plan selection and <br />design. Support <br />Allocation of state sales and use <br />tax from motor vehicles for <br />highway purposes <br />(Jan Gerstenberger) —Again this year <br />the Transportation Legislation Review <br />Committee (TLRC) has endorsed a pro- <br />posal from Sen. Ray Powers and Rep. <br />Ron May to re -enact the "Noble Bill," <br />an annual allocation to the HUTF of a <br />portion of the state's sales and use tax <br />collections attributed to the sales of <br />automobiles and auto related acces- <br />sories such as tires, batteries, and motor <br />oil. <br />The proposal would transfer to HUTF <br />an additional $150 million per year that <br />is currently going to the state's general <br />fund. It would divide the money among <br />the state, counties, and municipalities on <br />the commonly used 60- 22 -18- percent <br />formula. <br />The funds would be subject to the same <br />spending limits as the current HUTF <br />funds: for highway purposes with no <br />money for administration. As included <br />last year, each local government would <br />be required annually to certify to the <br />state treasurer that receipt of these addi- <br />tional HUTF monies would not exceed <br />the allowable fiscal year spending (or <br />the entity has received prior voter <br />approval to spend the revenue). If such <br />certification is not provided, then that <br />entity's share of the funds reverts to the <br />state. Support (but work for clean -up <br />December 6, 1996 <br />amendments to the certification process <br />and amendments to allow the funds to <br />be spent for any transportation purpose, <br />not just highways) <br />County road and bridge mill levy <br />(Jan Gerstenberger) —Defer action on <br />•any legislation at this time and monitor <br />road and bridge mill levy practices in <br />counties and assess county reaction to <br />specific ownership tax legislative <br />strategy. <br />State bridge fund <br />(Jan Gerstenberger)—A bill will sunset <br />the set -aside of a portion of the motor <br />fuel tax revenues for the state special <br />bridge fund, and allow the funds to <br />revert to the HUTF, increasing the <br />amount distributed to each municipality <br />and county. Support <br />Rural transportation authority <br />(Jan Gerstenberger) —It is anticipated <br />that a bill similar to CML- supported SB <br />96 -232, Concerning the Creation of the <br />"Rural Transportation Authority Law," <br />will be introduced again this year. The <br />power to create rural transportation <br />authorities is authorized for any area of <br />the state that is not included in the <br />boundaries of the RTD area in the <br />Denver metro area. Urban areas over <br />1 million population now have the <br />ability to create public highway authori- <br />ties (43-4 -506, C.R.S.). <br />In general, SB 232 allowed municipali- <br />ties and counties to create a transporta- <br />tion authority for the purpose of "rural <br />transportation activities," which are <br />defined generally as any type of trans <br />portation (highway, bus, rail, etc). <br />It gives the authority a variety of rev- <br />enue- raising powers sales or use tax <br />up to 0.4 of 1 percent, annual motor <br />vehicle registration fee up to $10 per <br />vehicle, tolls and user fees and charges, <br />transportation expansion fee on building <br />permits, head tax on employees and <br />occupation tax on businesses not to <br />exceed $2 /month, local improvement <br />district, value capture area for property <br />tax and sales tax —and the ability to <br />CML Statehouse Report <br />7 <br />