Laserfiche WebLink
Howard wondered if it stated in the document how to balance the look and feel of one set of <br />guidelines that people are ready doing and committed to and then imposing a new set of guidelines. <br />Is that fair? How will there be continuity in the look and feel of the overall product? <br />Wood pointed out that the document stated, in terms of building orientation, site planning and <br />architectural, there are sections that reflect the need to be compatible with adjoining developments. <br />Mayer wanted Council to know which properties in Centennial Valley were vested, soon if possible. <br />Levihn was concerned with the lack of clarity of some of the issues in this ordinance. <br />Lathrop asked the committee to make one more attempt to resolve the specific issues that had been <br />brought up. <br />Davidson stated that in general he agreed with everything in the document. There was no intention <br />to be unfair to the developer. <br />Sisk suggested making this into a guideline, so as not to be "locked in." <br />Howard wanted to know how much pad space is available vs. how much is already used. He wanted <br />staff to mitigate some of the imposition that is being given in areas like Parcel 0 having common <br />setbacks and open areas. How would the City be equitable in applying that to forward going pad <br />sites? He wanted to go through the list in a work session environment. <br />Keany wanted written comments from the Planning Commission and Council submitted prior to the <br />work session. <br />Davidson reopened the public hearing and moved that Council continue Ordinance No. 1242, Series <br />1997, until Tuesday, May 6, 1997, seconded by Sisk. All in favor. <br />Davidson wanted Council to submit their comments to staff, so staff would have a chance to work <br />on them. Also, submit to the City Attorney the specific. questions Council wanted answered by her. <br />Sisk asked the developers to submit written comments also. <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1249, SERIES 1997 APPROVING AN ANNEXATION, KNOWN AS <br />1HE DAUGHENBAUGH ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE, COLORADO <br />2ND READING PUBLIC HEARING (PUBL. LSVL. TIMES 2/22/97, 3/1/97, 3/15/97) <br />Griffiths read by title only Ordinance No. 1249, Series 1997, "An Ordinance approving an annexation, <br />known as the Daughenbaugh Annexation to the City of Louisville, Colorado." <br />8 <br />