My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1997 07 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1997 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1997 07 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:01:55 PM
Creation date
11/13/2009 12:38:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
7/1/1997
Original Hardcopy Storage
5A1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1997 07 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Davidson called for the applicant's presentation. <br />Erik Hartronft, Hartronft Associates, 1021 South Boulder Road, Louisville, Colorado, reviewed the <br />project. He pointed out that the building will have an elevator for ADA accessibility and the building <br />will be brought up to current building and fire code. Sprinklers will be added to the building. A steel <br />framed canvas awning will be on the front of the building. <br />Davidson called for Council comments. <br />Mayer was concerned that the signage be done well and that only three parking spaces would be <br />added for 4,500 s.f of office space. The parking impact on the neighborhood would be tremendous. <br />Lathrop liked the project. <br />Keany wanted a drawing of the building from the across the street to see what the building would <br />look like. <br />Sisk wanted to know the types of retail/office mixture they were proposing. <br />Hartronft stated that they were going to encouraging retail use on the first floor and office upstairs. <br />They hope to start occupancy this fall. <br />Sisk wanted the increased parking need resolved. <br />Hartonft felt the parking issues are a downtown -wide problem rather than a site specific problem. <br />Howard thought the outside lighting appeared to be more intensive than what currently exists on site. <br />He wanted to know the signage plans and that the doors were in conformance with safety codes in <br />terms of ingress /egress. He wanted to know the impact on on- street parking and he wondered if <br />Louisville might have to go to head -in parking. He did like the project. <br />Levihn liked the project, particularly the retail on the first floor. He was concerned about the parking. <br />He did consider the parking problem downtown a City problem, not necessarily the owners of the <br />businesses. <br />Davidson liked the project. As far as the parking, he pointed out that the parking issue came up for <br />the expansion further down Main Street and Council added language about a parking district. He <br />suggested the same language be added about the financial obligation. <br />Sisk moved that Council move this on to the Planning Commission, seconded by Howard. All in <br />favor. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.