My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2009 11 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2000-2009 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2009 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2009 11 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:23:40 PM
Creation date
11/18/2009 2:42:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
11/2/2009
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C1
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2009 11 02
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Utility); Golf Course; Solid Waste Recycling Utility; Internal Service and Debt <br />Service Funds. <br />The 2010 General Fund Budget significant changes include the following: <br />Eliminated positions and hours; eliminated or reduced programs; increased fees; <br />and cost of streetlights increase of up to $77,000 to $427,000 annually. <br />General Fund Forecast Assumptions: <br />Sales Tax Revenue: -7.0% in 2009, -2.0% in 2010, another 1.0% in 2011, <br />flat in 2012, gradually increase (Ave 1.5 2013 through 2015. <br />Property Tax Revenue: +4.5% in 2010; Ave +2.7% through 2014, 21% <br />in 2015 from ConocoPhillips development. <br />Total General Fund Revenues: +1.9% from 2010 through 2015. <br />Salaries and Wages: +2.45% from 2010 through 2015. <br />Employee Benefits (FICA, Retirement, Health Care, and Workers' <br />Compensation): +4.8% from 2010 through 2015. <br />Total General Fund Expenditures: +1.6% from 2010 through 2015 -3.6% <br />in 2010), including annual "turnback" of 3 <br />Council was asked to consider the following: Does the proposed budget reflect <br />guiding principles? Are revenue and expenditure estimates reasonable? Does <br />the budget adequately reflect the City's needs? Can the City maintain services <br />over the long -term? <br />Mayor Sisk requested public comments. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 20, 2009 <br />Page 5 of 15 <br />Eva Kosinski, 1301 Jackson Court, Louisville, CO stated many key City services <br />were sacrificed for recreation services. She noted the core services are police, <br />public works and building safety and not the golf course or recreation facilities. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Mayor Pro Tem Marsella asked for clarification on the reduction to the events <br />budget. City Manager Fleming explained in 2009, the line item for the July 4th <br />event is $36,900; $7,000 was raised, for a net budget contribution of $29,900. <br />The actual cost for the event was $40,647; $10,651 was raised for a net cost to <br />the City of $29,997 ($96.00 over budget). The recommended budget for 2010 is <br />$30,000, with required fund raising of $7,000, for a net budget amount of <br />$23,000. <br />In 2009, the Fall Festival budget was $24,000; $4,500 was required for a net <br />2009 budget spending of $19,500. The actual cost for 2009 was $25,577, with <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.