Laserfiche WebLink
NONE <br /> <br />Davidson closed the public hearing and called for Council questions or motions. <br /> <br />Howard moved that Council adopt Ordinance No. 1276, Series 1998, on second and final reading, <br />seconded by Keany. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 7 - 0 vote. <br /> <br />Davidson suggested vacating all other portions of the nonexistent alley that had not been vacated, as <br />a "housekeeping measure". <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 3, SERIES 1998 FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT AND PUD <br />DEVELOPMENT PLAN - COAL CREEK BUSINESS PARK, REFERRED TO THE <br />PLANNING COMMISSION ON JANUARY 6, 1998 <br /> <br />Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that this application had been sent back to the Planning <br />Commission who reconsidered it at their January 22 meeting. The Planning Commission approved <br />the Final Plat and Final PUD with nine conditions. The applicant had met those conditions. This <br />resolution was forwarded to Council with the recommendation of approval with three conditions. <br />The applicant noted on the PUD cover sheet and in their response letter that they agree to equitably <br />participate in possible future interchange improvement funding for the McCaslin interchange. <br /> <br />Bill Simmons, City Administrator, stated, concerning the McCaslin interchange recoveries, that <br />through the IGA with Superior, the two communities are to work together to formulate a plan for <br />the reconstruction of the McCaslin interchange. Different financing mechanisms are credits and sales <br />tax and the possible formation of a special improvement district. Since the original wording on the <br />PUD, there had been discussions with the applicant about revising the language (Simmons passed out <br />revised language from the City Attorney.). <br /> <br />Sam Light, City Attorney, stated that it is the City's intent to ask the owner to agree and <br />acknowledge that this property would be benefitted by improvements to the interchange and therefore <br />waive any objection they might have based on that issue. <br /> <br />Davidson wanted language stating that those in Centennial Valley who have already paid $5 million <br />up front, get credit for their share for their percentage of use. <br /> <br />Sisk suggested adding additional language to the paragraph asking that the owner acknowledge the <br />contributions previously made by Homart and refer to the agreement, so that they know that that is <br />to cover for the Centennial Valley project. <br /> <br />Davidson called for the applicant's presentation. <br /> <br />Greg Armstrong, Vice President with Tramwell Crow Co., 7535 East Hampden Avenue, #650, <br />Denver, Colorado 80231, reviewed the project. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />