Laserfiche WebLink
Mayer offered a friendly amendment that the wall-mounted lighting be eliminated from the northeast <br />and northwest inset sections and be replaced with surface mounted bollard lighting, accepted by <br />Keany. <br /> <br />Sisk offered a friendly amendment that the applicant grade offthe site by one-and-a-half to two feet, <br />to bring the building down, which was not accepted by Keany or seconder Mayer. <br /> <br />Sisk moved that Council add a condition that the applicant grade off the site one-and-a-half feet, <br />seconded by Howard. <br /> <br />Ellerman requested that Council consider alternative options to grading the site, due to the severe <br />impact to the final drainage plan. <br /> <br />Paul Webber, Civil Engineer with Johnson Engineering Associates, explained that the grading <br />is being controlled by the presence of a Public Service gas line which runs through the site. Cutting <br />above the gas line would eliminate the minimum coverage required by Public Service. <br /> <br />Lathrop felt that asking the applicant to perform major, expensive adjustments in order to achieve <br />a eighteen inch height reduction was ridiculous. <br /> <br />Roll call was taken on the amendment. Amendment failed by a 2-5 vote, with Sisk and Howard <br />voting yes. <br /> <br />Davidson offered a friendly amendment that all wall-mounted signs visible from Dillon Road be <br />tumed off at 11:00 p.m., accepted by Keany and seconder Mayer. <br /> <br />Sam Light, City Attorney, repeated the conditions attached to the Resolution for clarification. <br /> <br />Keany offered a friendly amendment to his motion that the fixed design criteria for signage be <br />included as a condition, accepted by seconded Mayer. <br /> <br />Howard stated that he could not support this plan due to the fact that the applicant was aware of the <br />height limitations when the process initially began and Council has penalized previous applicants <br />for not adhering to the height limitation. <br /> <br />Roll call was taken on Resolution No. 24, as amended. Motion passed by a 4-3 vote, with Sisk, <br />Lathrop, and Howard opposing. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION No. 25, SERIES 1998 - FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN <br /> OFFICE BUILDING ON LOT 2, COAL CREEK BUSINESS PARK <br /> <br />Davidson called for staff presentation. <br /> <br /> <br />