Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 02 11 ConocoPhillips

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes DECEMBER 10, 2009 Page 2 of 6 Staff Report of Facts and Issues: McMillan provided the following recap of the November meeting: • Motion of approval to increase the square footage cap to 475,000 SF • Motion of approval to reduce the parking ratio to 1/500 SF • Decision to not make a recommendation to City Council on the fee -in -lieu of parking • Tabled the discussion of parking credits, reductions and remote parking McMillan continued with a discussion of the parking credits, reductions and remote parking. The discussion included the following poin • • Proposal o Parking reduction (25%) where share p. • is used o Parking credit (25%) for on -street spaces o Allowance for remote parking up t600 feet • Idea: create a common parking review the revitalization area dard between downtown and • Commissioners expressed concerns with the pr•posal at tht meeting • Staff Report included responses to the follow oncerns: o How would shared agreements fun o Residential parking should be acco odated on -site o Use of public property for private ga McMillan concluded with a recap of Resolut ries 2009 as follows: • Includes recomm. tions from the . 'r m eting: o Increa o Rearkinc,�tio • Includes the credit, reduction andjnote parking recommendations. Members of the Public: Michael ► - 1827 Chokecherry Dr., Louisville discussed the following: mis Loos questions from the November meeting regarding the edits for o .treet parking and public resources vs. private benefit nsider public resources for public benefit • ' .t for on -street is a good idea and is only permitted for 25% of the req • parking • Does .gree with a shared parking agreement because users and property . ' rs change • Remote pa g might result in stand alone parking lots Loo and Menaker discussed the fee in lieu option. Commission Questions: Hartman stated if the shared parking agreement travels with the property then what is the recourse of businesses that do not get along when a change in ownerships occurs. McMillan stated a PUD could be amended to include shared parking. Sheets asked if shared parking language is established for title or deeds.