Laserfiche WebLink
• i <br /> .{t <br /> Page „ _ . <br /> the property in its entirety, aurae the church wanted to build there, <br /> Don't recall that we ever admitted liability. Mote on the bottom of the <br /> letter $442.00 penalty clays to the contract - after SO days daisy attorney's <br /> fees $500.00. Max Soaks hand writing - in conversation with Jack Jevenm <br /> attorney stated =Oar ao ciransrstaiwes would we pay $2,440.00. Mr. Ammo <br /> agreed. Church built over water line was 16S' out of easement. <br /> CWNCZ m Sill you said you could wok* that tie on the north and south fads, you <br /> will have to wait. <br /> AIAS s K* requested payment 3 moths ' o. <br /> MR. WURL: I would recoemmsnd that Council authorise payment $4,900.50. <br /> Motion by Jansen, seconded by Zing to pay Ajax. Motion carried. <br /> BEZGMIMO REQUEST, <br /> Miway 42 and South Boulder Mood. Letter from Planning Commission in regards <br /> to rescuing to business soar 3-4 Zoning xequsst following is recosmendation <br /> for business - Public baring held Deosnber 21, 1972. Mewed to r000wland <br /> to City Council that the coning be established as ED {Zvoaomic Development) <br /> on this S acres. lowliest date for Public Clearing P bxoary 4, 1973. <br /> BOO LORD s Mspres.nting 3••J - if it Is saved ID would caws a financing wattles. <br /> V.$r4' The reason for SD was not to tie present development. Susiness waning vs <br /> allow any typo of business. Once the land is sold we lose all control of <br /> what goes in there - with ID Coil could still maintain what kind of busi- <br /> ness goes in there. <br /> PZMCY, Reason Pleasing Commission wanted it SD is we had too much static. Very <br /> undersixabie to have manufacturing plants ir. bwiossa district. <br /> Notion by King, seconded by Scholl t,-at we concur with PlaAaing C,rwtssions <br /> recommedsticns... Moll call vote - Dsbowski yes, Ming yes, Jensen yes, <br /> Scholl yes, Domenico Mo. Notion tarried with one no rote. <br /> Date set for Public Hearing - February G. 1972. <br /> MR. Muhl; Road request from Johnston and Hancock to consider replotting of Lots <br /> • & 9 C'otto'avwood Manor. Planning Commission received request to r plat lots <br /> d i 9 into foot/ individual plate. Planning Commission made motion to recommend <br /> to City Council stipulation that it conforms with the original contract. <br /> Mo more density permitted. Zilch plat will have 5,000 foot. <br /> U$G s flak* aura they sweet all zoning requirements. Motion by Dsborski to accept <br /> the proposal with the stipulation that they must abide by swing requirements <br /> and seconded by Xing. lotion carried. <br /> • <br /> woaD SMCTHZU AZATIOM r <br /> or. Meal. Wood Brothers representatives would like to submit a preliminary plat <br /> and asked that they obtain the council's Approval on the potential and feasi- <br /> bilit . f the proposed annexation. lotion by Deboreki, seconded by Scholl to <br /> submit to the Planning Commission for further detailed study. lotion carried. <br /> MIX NOVA]; Prevented throe things for Council's approval relating to Sproul. <br /> I. Land user and circulation plan - identical to that which was presented <br /> last S*ptewber. <br /> 2. Sequential plan that we have now one through 4 which they would propose <br /> for annexation in this particular order based on ooh-sixth contiguity <br /> • requirement. <br /> first o.-s continguous to the school if this is submitted and approved <br /> than the next three would be submitted. The tracts to be annexed and coned <br />