My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1973 02 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1973 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1973 02 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:32 PM
Creation date
12/28/2009 3:19:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
2/20/1973
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1973 02 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. :. •-• - rye_ <br /> • <br /> 1t 's Otis awl etatt mesas <br /> ES arse <br /> tro,+k,r .coioredo <br /> Pbbreary i, 117$ <br /> • <br /> ■r. Laos Vaal <br /> City Administrator <br /> 740 Male street <br /> Louisville, Colorado 10017 <br /> Dears lira <br /> This Loularilla Para and leoreatioea Cosaaissies, l■ s000rdance with your <br /> rs uest, has reviewed the proposed Parlwood Asgstios. <br /> We would libe to sobs the following reeoalssudsticsr: <br /> 1. We do not 'sat the strip of property betimes Tracts "1" and <br /> mC" tufting to Lanaoln Street. <br /> 1. M would line to see the park area ar uad the pad ieearoossd <br /> by alloostiai the west end of Tract "1M tar park use. (ire <br /> attached overlay). <br /> 3. We do not want Tract '1" es park property. <br /> 4. We would recaresd that the Diesel/4 cawmissios require the <br /> developer to set aside and equip a playground is Tracts <br /> "A", and "Cm. This playground is to remain is possession <br /> of the tpartaest complex comer. <br /> Our justification for our reoorendstioss is as follows: <br /> 1. This property provides aatnral draias`e and owot be developed <br /> • ocosa.ically. The strip will be a weisanos to nsiatsia. The <br /> advisability of attoeiptiap to beep thin law area clean rhea it <br /> provides a caswa1ent deep for private haw and high darwity <br /> homes is certainly lueatioaable. The strip does not provide <br /> nay advantage to tbe city and should not be accepted. :N would <br /> recomeesd that cash for development of the rest of the property <br /> be requested la dhow of this land. <br /> 2. The park area as *aimed does not provide *sough separations <br /> en <br /> between the higk density de llinps in Tract "i see the pond. <br /> V. wish to beep this area materiel sod have no develop . t <br /> plans beyond soil aalutamates. The sepa,rstios as it is <br /> ox the plat plan is approximately 40 feet. This is iawttficieas <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.