My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1975 06 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1975 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1975 06 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:35 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 9:39:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
6/3/1975
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1975 06 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
caned 1"W 7f <br /> inat KO wtthi . list, ti~ '� r, <br /> paasitc mold to issued through •. <br /> • <br /> the <br /> Comte!• •-. <br /> MART DUNA= - PETITIONS Mks. petitions so sated Council ¶ <br /> with favor the annexation <br /> of the Waal Indus site, vitida VOXa .: <br /> circulated through the Louisville Cit- <br /> iic u <br /> for Progress and Fairness committee. <br /> Mayor liaacbak t rnnhsd Mrs. DiLorenso <br /> and the group for their efforts. There <br /> were approximately 500 signatures, <br /> SOLICITORS Mr. Steve Anderson asked what could be • . <br /> done with solicitors as they are using <br /> false pretenses to pat into your bone <br /> to sal inss, etc. if. Wuxi stated <br /> that solicitors are to have a license <br /> and that if one does enter your bore *he - <br /> doss not have a City license notify City <br /> Nall. It vas stated that religious orders <br /> are exempt from obtaining a solicitors <br /> license. <br /> COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman DslPisso asked hat 1.11.1041 <br /> could classify the Nisei annexation as <br /> a nay development. Mr. burl stated that <br /> it was the different interpretations <br /> that haves been Sot by the Rows Sill. <br /> PAUINO LOT Councilmen Da1Pi:so asked if some type <br /> of limited parking signs, or something <br /> could be placed on the parking lot <br /> south of City Nall so people on official <br /> businaes within City Sall Mound have <br /> a chance to park closer to the building'dimmed=di it vas stated that the <br /> "Otter sold be discussed with the <br /> Mice Department. No further action ~• <br /> w 4• <br /> DiCarlo moved that the <br /> Cavil reports be accepted. Seconded <br /> CITY by Councilman DslPi:so. Motion carried, • <br /> • CAAaTT ALUM Mr. Vial stated that a letter was seat <br /> out to all involved parties regarding <br /> the decision to be wads on the a11e1 <br /> running north and south between the Park- <br /> wood subdivision and the older part of <br /> the City. Be stated that the responses <br /> were 3 and 3, however it was the staffs <br /> recomendatiots that the alley be vacated. <br /> After .discussion on the matter Cauvci]awe <br /> D'1Cedo moved dthaatt the City Attorney b* :* <br /> j y t , i 1F 41041144.4411011,,,* ,. , <br /> - -- - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.