My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1975 06 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1975 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1975 06 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:35 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 9:39:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
6/3/1975
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1975 06 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
,.lti- x"1 1 ..*:M3*: r+ �r, � 1.4 •fi r v'. .;k* :{' -?•" .'R ' , _-. '• <br /> CITY ATIORMLY - ` i - <br /> WIZEL Ah@IUATION wEPOIT Attorney Morris stated that Wad filed :;,-ii,, <br /> im. the Colorado Supremo Comb a writ <br /> of prohibition which if panted would <br /> direct the district judge is Phan osoas f, <br /> why hi. ua■■ppov�cary restraining Order should:, <br /> not be quashed. Attorney Morris stated . <br /> Maid thaMaid will here on the matter during '0# <br /> the caning week. Attorney !!orris stated <br /> that there was a pretrail con/erases `I <br /> vet for May 22, 1975, at 9:00 a.*. to <br /> try to define the issues and on May 27, 1975, <br /> at 9:00 11.16 the trial will be held to <br /> determine on the permanent or temporary <br /> injunction. If the court adopts the -f <br />- Land Use Commissions and the County's <br /> position, it would prohibit the City.from • <br /> annexing the property until the Land <br /> Use Commission regulations have been <br /> followed. Rae stated that one of the <br /> LIMAS in the court is whether or not <br /> the Land Use Commission has the authority ' <br /> to state that the City of Louisville may <br /> not receive the annexation and whether or <br /> not the City has conjunctive rights over <br /> the property with the county. Attorney <br /> Morris passed out Resolution #14 <br /> which would allow his to deal with the <br /> litigation as he sees fit in the best <br /> interest of the City <br /> RESOLUTION #14 Attorney Morris read Resolution #14. <br /> After discussion Councilman DelPisso <br /> moved that Resolution #14 be adopted. <br /> Seconded by Councilman DiCarlo. Motion <br />_ carried. <br /> ORDINANCE #472 .t. :. <br /> A1�11DI1RQ ORDINANCE #440 Attorney Morris read Ordinance #472 <br /> to hater Tap Charges. Mk. <br /> 1 stated that this Ordinance per- <br /> tamed mainly to multi-family d.riliap. <br /> After discussion, Councilman Caranci <br /> loved that Ordinance #472 be ordered <br /> published. Seconded by Councilmen berry. <br /> 11 call. Carsaci yes. Earry rims Miemm <br /> yes, DelPisso yes, DiCarlo no. . Motion <br /> carried. <br /> SALES TAX Attorney Morris stated. that be still has <br />- no word from the State regarding the ratter, <br /> however, he will have an outline for <br /> Council to review <br /> _46aihighk.................. mvonaggesaimea... ),.*•." - -..,..,,.. - ... — 4'--., , . --P • . ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.