Laserfiche WebLink
5,. ^ ' ��. sdw • irk„ '�• ',• 4 ,, waI r+f ri11 y <br /> r' `.. ; �t..y1 1 +•. r:'. t "+♦.� `i1: i, <br /> 444*: sner and t* c t aM <br /> Mir. statedthat oahonld t oat <br /> for <br /> certain if Superior and Erie are going to stay <br /> in the project. . <br /> Camellias DlCarlo stated that a letter shoinid <br /> be write to h0. Madonna stating the acceptance : • <br /> of his verbal resignation as the representative <br /> on the Board. <br /> Cancilanre OalPisze stated that Mr. Madonna should <br /> be asked again and if hemmers the same then <br /> accept his resignation. Councillea De1Mszo <br /> felt that there mu be a conflict and that Mr. <br /> Madonna does not really want to resign, but is • <br /> having difficulties with serving on the Board. <br /> Mr. Marl stated that Mr. MMdonna has put Ruth <br /> effort into the project. Ne also stated that <br /> what is needed is that the people work in the <br /> area which is best iwited for there knowledge <br /> and expertise, Mr. Merl suggested that Mr. <br /> Madonna be asked to resign as Cal Creek <br /> representative, but asked to continue working <br /> on the project under another category. <br /> Councilwoman Dhisux Moved that Council accept <br /> M'. Madonnas verbal resignation from the Board <br /> as a representative of Louisville with the under <br /> standing that we agree to have him serve in <br /> another capacity as laison between the Board, rf <br /> County and State Legislation. Seconded by <br /> Councilman Domenico. Moll call on Motion. <br /> Domnenico yes, Berry yes, Caranci yes, Ohieux <br /> yes, DslPlzrao no, DiCarlo yes. Motion carried. <br /> CON I M( - BOETTCHER A CO. Mr. Wirt stated that Mr. Krahl was present to <br /> PROPOSED WATER BONDS present a Water Bond proposal to City Council. <br /> $800,000 Mr. Krahl passed to Council an outline of two <br /> different plans, Mr. Kral explained the <br /> ri;:lef. Mt. Knape stated that fret plan 51 the <br /> the program is much shatter therefore <br /> the interest rates would be lower. M►. Krahl <br /> said that the proposed plans are based on a <br /> projected a income of SI per tap as w s pre- <br /> we with the last proposal. Mr. Krahl stated <br /> • that looking at the growth and projected WOW <br /> end speaking with Mr. hurl, Mr. Krahl felt that • - <br /> it would not be necessary to increase the $4.50 <br /> foe up to $6.50. <br /> Councilmen Berry asked Mr. Wurl if he felt that <br /> the City could meet the obligations in the year <br /> 1979 and 1950. Mr. Wurl stated that he felt it <br /> would not be difficult to meet the obligation <br /> because the issue provides money for the City <br /> to acquire water in bulk amounts, and not have <br /> to string it out over a length of time. <br /> lr4.1+�� ,sir �jr <br />