City Council Agenda and Packet 1976 05 18

Home Browse Search

� al Y t r * .M_ { . • ,• y $0011 Or 044 IbUrittiaii* thik bowled • lamd3ar hose.{ SA tios was to acquit. t t he teak sad land to keep o out of the ar fens it. Pr rs.h sa .� sp-setsent with that whoa they • soil the properg thri.Rast pat the C1 k.e um for a minim of 5 sores. s for re- cormmudad that since this is within the .mount of money allocated for land acquisi- tica, the City purchase the 5 acres. Councilman Ceraatet eked who cooed the land. Mr. **l advised Tracts 1 than► S was owned by Ps Brokers Inc. and Tract 6 was owed City of Lafayette. Administra- tor sbr had discussed 'tract 6 with Maoeger Pelsch of the City of Lafayette9 mad the City of Lafayette wonted further iafor■etioa air to What over engineers felt Mould hove • left available to them where . cooed construct additional tanks, and the fu- cure a small treatment plant. Noel Cobbs provided this information to then. Some of the older Lafayette Council umbers now serving related years asp they had asked Louisville to put up half the money to acquire the land; and at that time Louis- ville was not willing to do so. Based on • our original appraisal of two years ago, the cost question arose. Apparently the City of Lafayette now thinks the land is worth twice as much peer acre. tr Brokers price is $3600. Lafayette s proposal Mss s6,000 per acre. Administra- tor 11=1 advised Manager Pelech her ores certain this price would not be sxeptable. er Peach stated the polftioal problem have to be resolved with higher lamed le is both city governments before the people be resolved. Isis suggestion • mud City Administrator Marl's as well wee to have our Mayor and Mayor pro-test have a meeting with the gentleam2 from Lafayette ; - about the price of the lead. 12. - :a :s %. �1, c�..