My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1976 11 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1976 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1976 11 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:36 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 10:09:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
11/4/1976
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1976 11 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'•1 T r. ^. • .. 'rte ,r' •,� . _ . , •_'�• Y' . Fes, <br /> • <br /> ^ • r. <br /> item I City Attorney ]tpor! <br /> A. Maybof ler report <br /> B. Resolution 023, Series 1971, this was submitted at <br /> the last Council meeting and was tabled because it <br /> had not been included in the packet. <br /> We are enclosing copies in this packet and recommend <br /> that it be adopted. <br /> C. Cat Information. We are enclosing in the packet in- <br /> formation that we have obtained through the CML <br /> relating to the control of cats. <br /> Item 7. City Administrator Report <br /> A. Acceptance of Deed - LAB Company. <br /> This is for a protion of the widening of South Boulder <br /> Road. We recommend that Council accept the deed. <br /> B. Oil A Gas Lease - I net with Mr. Roy Morris, in re- <br /> gards to this. They were to get back to me with their <br /> recommendation, both he and the City Attorney. At <br /> this writing I have nothing to submit. We should have. <br /> a recommendation by the Council meeting. <br /> C. City Hall project. This is one of the items that <br /> Council approved of and submitting of grant applications <br /> under the RDA money, unfortunately, one of the criteria <br /> is that we have plans and specifications for the app- <br /> - lication. The City Planner, Dennis Drumm, contacted <br /> an architect he knows and I will have for you by meeting <br /> night, a copy of his outline, basically what he is <br /> agreeing to do is the preliminary work necessary to <br /> submit for the grant. If we do not receive the grant, <br /> we would have no co■mittment to him in way of payment. <br /> If we get the grant and proceed, then would become part <br /> of the 10% architectural fees that he would charge for <br /> preparation. If we get the grant sad don't use then <br /> they would expect to be reimbursed for the time spent <br /> for the preparation of the preliminary plans at a <br /> maximum of $3,000. If we want to continuo the prom <br /> of requesting grant money for this project, we would <br /> have to develop some sort of preliminary plans to meet <br /> their criteria. <br /> D. Correspondence. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.