City Council Agenda and Packet 1976 12 21

Home Browse Search

i. 'l.!' ,•Y t fit.}/`"� 'i ,, .•..��,11 4,.,/,-1,. `_ 144', y1• ,, .+e LURA i11 , ,: 'i*,;1• ,4t. C lq } w t ,.r .;'.'T`if r '.1 -•.4' Dec - % +�7r.14.7—..74'11;74"-* tt/T`•l.•%71' Page ,• . _•� . - - , t;otion by Camps; Approval be given for Grant on Special Case 111 using ,4. Spec. Case Ill - State Funding. Seconded by Robinson. Discussion. Carried unanimously. motion by Camps: Providing the party qualifies, approval be given to S. Spec. Case 112 •5- Award a Separate Contract, with non-interest bearing loan and Promissory (Emergency Case) - Note to be included, using State funds. Seconded by Robinson. Discussion. • Carried unanimously. -- Motion by McDonald: Approval to amend Special Case 11, that the total 6. Amend Spec. Cise . funding be from the State rather than partial CO, as follows: Standard 01 Grant amount from State funds, and balance with non-interest bearing loan and promissory note from State funds. Seconded by Stead. Dis- cussion. Carried unanimously. Motion by Mudrock that names of grant and/or loan recepients be in- 7. Name Disclosere wt eluded with Special Cases. Seconded by Robinson. Roll Call Vote: with Special C 2 Ayes, 7 .Nays. Motion defeated. Chairman stated, however that this would not prok1hlt a motion during discussion of individual cases re- " quiring the recepients name be given. SOURCE AMOUNT OF FUNDING EXPENDITURES BALANCE 8. Rehab money report. 1st Yr. CD 45,500 43,643 1,857 �- 2nd Yr. CD 45,500 16,989 28,511 Colo.Horsing 144„ _ 9 16(thru 12/31/76) ;14718 Returned Grant CD 3rd Yr. CD 45,500 45,500 91,239 312 Loans Processed 13� 0 VII. Old Business .;r After long discussion, motion made by McDonald that the Director pre- a) 3rd leer es pare an Agenda of Events, Schedule of Meetings, and begin the 3rd Year Application CO Application prodecure and ail this to be presented to Board by next meeting. Seconded by Hinsberger. Carried unanimously. Tabled. b) LURA Property Lundberg opened the discussion; Board has 3 choices in regards to the c) CD Dept. Reorgaa: reorganization proposed by the City. 1) Approve City's reorganization ization proposal; 2) Proceed as now, under the current Cooperation Agreement. or 3) Respond with proposal from the LURA Board. Chairman asked Cheno-t weth to state his views on the subject. Chenoweth stated there was no 1 way he could respond; the idea was good in concept but timing was wrong', job description was built around a men; and he would, of course, do as the Board desired. r 1. :r