Laserfiche WebLink
0 October 4, 1977 . <br /> Page 2, Minutes <br /> ORDINANCE 067 CONTINUED speaking against the Ordinance #567 was <br /> Nadine Lybarger 1426 Hain St. , who pre- <br /> seated a petition of 123 signatures of <br /> persons against the ordinance. . She also <br /> requested that the matter be brought to <br /> a vote of the people. <br /> Also s ag is nst the ordinance was <br /> Rita 141:218 fain St. , Bud..Barday <br /> 600 Garfield and Mary Parkin 936 Parkvisw. <br /> Barbara Haar asked several questions <br /> about the ordinance pertaining to the <br /> trapping of the animals. <br /> Other comments against the ordinance <br /> included the concern of cats hanging them- <br /> selves with the collars, also cats would <br /> be picked up and brought over to the pond <br /> and the designation of three cats making <br /> a kennel. <br /> There were no other comments and the <br /> discussion was turned over to council. <br /> Councilman DiLorenzo stated for the record <br /> • that she was not a cat hater and that the <br /> only reason she did not have any was <br /> becasue she was alergic to them. She stated <br /> that she has had many complaint. from citi- <br /> zens of the City and was trying to protect <br /> them as well as the cats. <br /> Councilman DelPizzo felt this to be a highly <br /> controversial issue and that it should be <br /> brought to a vote of the people. He also <br /> stated that in the ordinance it stated that <br /> if a cat is picke up three times in one <br /> month it is classified as an abandoned cat <br /> and therefore the animals would not really <br /> be able to run at large. as stated by <br /> Attorney Joss. <br /> Percy Conarroe stated that it should be put <br /> in the ordinance how the animal is going <br /> to be caught. <br /> Councilman Caranci stated that under the <br /> dog control it does not state any specific <br /> means of catching the animal. <br /> After comments Mayor Waschak closed the <br /> public hearing and Councilman DelPisto moved <br /> that the ordinance #567 be defeated. <br /> There was no second; Mayor Wasehak stating <br /> that the motion Was dead. <br />