My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1978 05 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1978 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1978 05 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:38 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 10:32:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
5/2/1978
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1978 05 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
41, . April 18, 197$ <br /> utes - page 2 <br /> FERRERA REQUEST still be the chain link from the property <br /> CONTINUED line to the edge of the sidewalk. , <br /> It was noted that the easement on the north <br /> ' side of the property is maintained by the <br /> property owner and if the fence is not <br /> allowed there will be persons cutting <br /> across the grass to get to the open <br /> space area. .; :--; <br /> Mr. Drum vsea <br /> noted that it was his reco - <br /> dation that the fence not be allowed as <br /> there is a bike path directly behind the <br /> fence and if the erson on the north side <br /> of the street would request the save, it <br /> may be very dangerous with young people <br /> darting out into the street behind the <br /> fence. <br /> Councilman DiCarlo asked if the code for <br /> the setback was in effect when the other <br /> fence was installed; and if so, who <br /> approved the installation. Mr. Drumm <br /> stated that he was not sure and that <br /> during the time of changes. Wood Bros. <br /> was in the process of developing. <br /> After discussion Councilman Caranci moved <br /> that action be taken on the request. <br /> Seconded by Councilman Meier. Roll call. <br /> DiLorenzo yes, Caranci yes, Meier yes, <br /> DelPizzo no DiCarlo yes, Kilker no. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Councilman DelPizzo stated that he was <br /> not familiar with the area and felt that <br /> the problem whould be looked at. <br /> Councilman Caranci then moved that the <br /> property owner be allowed to put a fence <br /> in up to their property line and the ex- <br /> cess chain link fence be removed and staff <br /> study the problem of maintenance. Se- <br /> conded by Councilman DiLorenzo. Roll <br /> call. DiCarlo no, Caranci no, Kilker no, <br /> DiLorenzo no, Meier no, DelPizzo no. . <br /> Motion defeated. <br /> Council and staff will check further into <br /> the request. <br /> AUDIENCE COMMENTS There were no comments from the audience. <br /> CITY ATTORNEY REPORT Attorney Joss stated that all necessary <br /> ORDINANCE #584 publications have been made and that Mr. <br /> GENERAL OBLIGATION Dunn Krahl was in attendance to answer <br /> WATER BOND - SECOND any questions. <br /> READING Attorney Joss read Ordinance #584 on se- <br /> cond reading by title only. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.