My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1979 02 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1979 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1979 02 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:39 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 10:41:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
2/6/1979
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1979 02 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- y. i* moo..,• <br /> 2.3 Agricultural uses od area would find in <br /> { like the Cooutr of <br /> Boulder« It is interesting to take a look • <br /> at your use categories under A-Agricultural ;. • <br /> • soar and they sound an awful lot ilkrg,: <br /> that which urbanisation is contrasted with '? <br /> mood what ors would typically find in a <br /> terms situation.ithe an xat�tact. property must <br /> be in the process of urbanization or about <br /> to be urbanized in order to qualify for <br /> annexation. <br /> I point out that as far as this particular <br /> property that A-Agricultural zoning is <br /> also inconsistent with the surrounding <br /> properties within the City of Louisville <br /> and the adjacent City of Lafayette. With <br /> your permission I would like to step to <br /> the drawing. Immediately to the south of <br /> the property across the street is indus- <br /> trial zoned land in the City of Louisville. <br /> put up structures such as the Storage Tech <br /> building. Again immediately south of the <br /> subject property CB, that is your most in- <br /> tensive commercial business district. A <br /> Sears and Roebuck could go on that property. <br /> Immediately to the north and across the <br /> road is the City limits of Lafayette. The <br /> R-3 zoning district immediately adjacent <br /> permits on 9 000 square foot lots a tri- <br /> ples. In ogler words three dwelling units <br /> can be placed on a 9.000 foot lot or one <br /> dwelling unit per 3,000 square feet. <br /> Immediately to the north and across the <br /> street the R-A zoning district in Lafayette <br /> which is also adjacent to the sub•,ect pro- <br /> perty permits 1 dwelling unit on 7,000 <br /> square foot lots. So insofar as the land <br /> which is immediately adjacent to the sub- <br /> ject property which is ocated within this <br /> municipalities. either Lafayette or Louis- <br /> ville, we are talking about some very <br /> different type of use categories. As opposed <br /> to one dwelling unit on 5 acres which this <br /> property is subject to in the City of Louis- <br /> ville. we've of here one dwelling unit on <br /> 3,000 square feet right across the street. <br /> So it seems to me that it is pretty clear <br /> that insofar as the existing pattern of <br /> land use. this property in really incon- <br /> sistent with adjacent properties. Now there <br /> are county properties which are zoned agri- <br /> cultural but they again are outside the <br /> City limits. So, as far as adjacent pro- <br /> perties. we have the full rang• of urban <br /> services. We have the industrial zone <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.