My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1979 02 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1979 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1979 02 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:39 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 10:41:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
2/6/1979
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1979 02 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4- ,fir - , •.tT"R'T • • _' • _' ^• <br /> ♦ Op <br /> 79 page <br /> I • ~ <br /> • <br /> OMMANCS 1W. 623 It's also interesting to note that if To • <br /> TUC NSANINO taker • look at the sousing map of Louisville <br /> CONTINUUM ' there is no low density residential d <br /> land east of Main 3t. in City. of <br /> Louisville. It is either asdius .density <br /> or higher idensity, or it's l or <br /> • it's trial. At this present tom. <br /> at least the most current Boning map that <br /> I saw, there is nothing oast of Mein 8t. <br /> that provides for low density residential. <br /> There is one other sons that is less in- <br /> tense than the low density residintial <br /> district and that is the estate residential <br /> sowing district. That also provides <br /> minimal lot size of 12,000 square feet as <br /> opposed to the 7,000 square fest permitted <br /> in the R• . zone. Will, the decision is up <br /> to this Council, but we would submit that <br /> even 12,000 square foot lots are fairly <br /> inefficient in terms of providing sewer <br /> and water utility services as well as <br /> affording police protection and other <br /> services that have to be provided to this <br /> kind of development. <br /> Also, 12,000 foot lots are fain eexxppensive. <br /> If its the desire of the City of- Louis'. <br /> f ville to provide large lot developments and <br /> large price tags, well that might be an <br /> appropriate zoning category to provide for <br /> this property. <br /> We would like to underscore that this re- <br /> quested rezoning is a fairly modest one, <br /> of going from agricultural a questionable <br /> zoning district to a low density esidential. <br /> Typically, zoning disputes involve changes <br /> from residential zones to commercial zones <br /> or residential to industrial and commercial <br /> to industrial. This is a fairly modest one <br /> from an agricultural sone to a typical re- <br /> sidential zone that one finds typically in <br /> urban communities. <br /> Insofar as effecting surrounding properties, <br /> we believe that a low density residential <br /> zoning is not going to intrude upon the <br /> industrial neighbor or the commercial busi- <br /> ness neighbor or even the spartment uses <br /> in the adjacent property in Lafayette. <br /> This is not going to adwrsly effect the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> An important point that some times, I think, <br /> { in the consideration of this particular <br /> matter that you lose sight of if the fact <br /> that the comprehensive plan shows this as <br /> open space. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.