My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 05 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1982 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 05 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:50 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 11:58:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
5/4/1982
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1982 05 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
411 410 <br /> • <br /> 4/20/82 Page -5- <br /> APPROVAL Councilman Cummings moved, Councilman <br /> Fauson seconded the Boulder Valley Pow <br /> Wow be granted a 3.2% Beer Liquor License, <br /> Roll call Vote: <br /> YES: Morris, Cummings, Meier, <br /> Ferrite, Fauson <br /> NO: Cussen, Leary <br /> • <br /> Motion carried 5-2. <br /> HAMMER SUBDIVISION REQUEST Director Rupp felt it was not a good policy <br /> of the City to waive subdivison improve- <br /> ments:as it creates problems in the future. <br /> Lew Hamner, 600 Bella Vista Dr. Each councilmember had a copy of his re- <br /> quest. Mr. Hammer stated since utilities <br /> were approximately one-half from his property <br /> it was not economically feasible to make <br /> the required improvements for the one acre <br /> site he intended to purchase from Dick <br /> Ferguson at 104th and Dillon Road. <br /> Councilman Leary Remarked the last time Council granted <br /> a similar request, it was granted on the <br /> condition that if subdivision occurred then <br /> the improvements would be provided. <br /> Administrator Wurl commented in the pre- <br /> vious instance if they subdivided beyond <br /> what they were contemplating at that time; <br /> the other factor was if utilities were within <br /> a given distance they would tie on to them. <br /> Mr. Hammer advised his needs would not exceed <br /> the existing buildings and.arenor*'thsn abegmtii. <br /> Administrator Wurl inquired of Mr. Hammer <br /> what his proposal was - was it to develop <br /> a one lot subdivision. <br /> Mr. Hammer advised it was a one lot sub- <br /> division, consisting of approximately 1 acre. <br /> APPROVAL Councilman Fauson moved, Councilman Leary <br /> seconded Lew Hammer's request to waive <br /> the subdivision improvements be granted. <br /> Councilman Leary Wished to add an amendment to this second, <br /> Amendment to the Motion that no further subdivision waivers be granted <br /> to no further subdivisions of Mr. Dick <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.