City Council Agenda and Packet 1983 06 07

Home Browse Search

+ • • 5/18/83 Page -5- Steven Anderson, Represent- Gave a slide presentation of the area located ing Moses and Rickman at 333 South Boulder Road, west of the Hill- side Square Development. County zoning agri- cultural, consisting of 1.3 acres, desig- nated residential land use on the comp plan, and was an enclave and currently has two residential units on the site. Mr. Anderson stated they had a peculiar situa- tion with the site in terms of placing homes and maintaining the ditch. The zoning request of the applicant was for R-H; however Planning Commission recommended R-M zoning. Initially when the request was made, staff requested that a 30' right-of-way be dedicated from the center of South Boulder Road for the expan- sion of South boulder Road. Subsequently after the first plan, an additional 30' was requested to make it a 60' right-of-way, which has been placed in the plan. He depicted this area on the map stating that it involved 21% of the overall site. Mr . Anderson felt this amount of dedicated property should be a factor in considering the differentiation of R-H and R-M zoning and the number of units it would allow for development , as well as the dollar amount in terms of economic feasi- bility of bringing the property into the City. This was the reason for the R-H zoning request; also the fact that the adjacent property is zoned R-H. There will also be a 12% dedi- cation of property or cash in lieu of upon development . Addtionally staff and Planning Commission have requested a joint access with the Hillside Square development. The appli- cant agrees with this requirement. R-H zon- ing was still being requested by the appli- cant or an alternative of density transfer with land dedicated area, i.e. allow only the square footage co be transferred in terms of density into the developable property. This would not bring it up to the density of R-H, rather it would split it in half. This compromise has been discussed with staff and the applicant wished to know Council's re- action to the compromise. Mayor pro-tem Fauson continued the public hearing - anyone in the audience that wished to speak in favor of Ordinance #789 -none. Anyone against Ordinance #789 - none. Questions - ix *.