My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1983 11 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1983 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1983 11 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:52 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:10:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
11/15/1983
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1983 11 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. 410 <br /> 11/3/83 Page -6- <br /> ::.Y AT'TORNEY 'S REPORT Councilmembers had a copy of the ordinance: <br /> =ROINANCE =878 - LOUISVILLE Attorney Rautenstraus read it by title only <br /> .;5S0CIATES - REZONING on first reading, and the request was for <br /> publication and a public hearing be set for <br /> December 6 , 1983 . Councilmembers also had <br /> copies of a proposed development agreement <br /> as well as a memo from the City Administrator <br /> highlighting some of the concerns in respect <br /> to the rezoning and development agreement. <br /> Administrator Wurl went through each of the <br /> 10 concerns listed on his memo. <br /> Si:SS:DNS - tiOv. 10, 1983 Mayor Meier suggested that study sessions <br /> AND NOV. 22 , :?93 be set up with council and the developer <br /> for the evenings of November 10 , and Nove:tb•,r <br /> 22 , 1.983 at 7 : 30 R.M. to discuss these con- <br /> cerns . <br /> _.,,,c..ilman Lear; Commented before a public hearing date is s . <br /> he would be interested in hearing from the <br /> applicant to see 'whether council has a clear <br /> understanding of these issues and if there <br /> is a good possibility that they will ae re- <br /> solved. <br /> jonh Alahuler, Representing Mr. Alshuler stated that they did not have <br /> Associates a copy of the list of concerns; but were <br /> prepared to have any study sessions that <br /> council desired to cal: tu <br /> so that the pubic hearing can be held on <br /> December 6 , 1933 . Felt confident tnat agree- <br /> ment could be reacned on the design guidelines , <br /> awaiting comments from the staff on this item, <br /> i .e. , ali•, of product , ie^sit, Issues , as <br /> .T <br /> well as ti ;ntening up the restrictions of any <br /> development c^ the mesa. <br /> Relative to the subdivision agreement , the <br /> attached setter addresses some of the issues <br /> that were raised last week. They are pre- <br /> pared to escrow the open space deeds upon <br /> approval of the rezoning . Felt that it would <br /> take several months :o complete t^e sur-,eys <br /> for cne open spaces . Have had discussions <br /> with McStain Enterprises and felt they were <br /> not far off from an agreement - that nas <br /> been clouded o: the tieing issue . Mr. Alsnuler <br /> stated this puts them in a bind as It creates <br /> a marketing proolem for _hem. ;han tae agree- <br /> ment is discussed wit^ McStain stated ne Was <br /> prepared to put forth an incentive plan tnat <br /> would work to promote a goal oriented positive <br /> attitude to oring tnc. commercial jeve: 7cment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.