My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1983 11 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1983 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1983 11 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:52 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:10:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
11/15/1983
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1983 11 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ilk <br /> 11/3/83 Page -3- <br /> Council;nembers Leary and Morris stated this <br /> was their understanding also. <br /> Administrator Wurl commented this was his <br /> inytial feeling; however it was not in the <br /> Director of Public Safety' s budget as a <br /> specific item allocated for Crime Stoppers , <br /> and when he discussed this with Director <br /> Leesman , Leesman advised that it was not. <br /> When asked if cuts could be made in his budget <br /> elsewhere to fund this program Leesman said <br /> no. <br /> :ouncilwcman Morris Commented that it was her feeling that S3, 0 : <br /> was set aside solely for Human Services , nc' <br /> to include LDC or the Chamber of Commerce. <br /> _ ounc iman Leary Commented when the Chamber of Commerce fund <br /> irg was discussed last year, that because <br /> of their bi-laws , council decided not to <br /> become 3 member but that the Chamber repre- <br /> sentatives come in with 3 specific protect <br /> that would be beneficia;. to the city and <br /> request funding for this. Felt this policy <br /> should be followed in 1984 also. it was his <br /> understanding that the Contingency Fund in the <br /> council budget did include %uman Services <br /> • but was not an exclusive fund but to deal <br /> :Jt ~;1 Other requests For fuhe'ine giro. <br /> '_DC Fund Re uest inquired what the request was from .,DC . <br /> :administrator Wurl stated it was approximately <br /> $6 , 200 . 00 . Also stated that the next payment <br /> from the Interchange Agreement is required <br /> to be paid before February 1 , 1334 . <br /> Counc_ ltar. ..ear._, then asked if this request <br /> from :..DC was in excess of this anticipate` <br /> payment from the ::. .e.charge Agreement , or <br /> is It the first installment of the 523 , 000? <br /> Administrator Wurl stated this was not clear <br /> to him at this time . <br /> "hcmpsoh: , Representing Mr. :hcm;son provided c_1nci :memoers with <br /> "u.,... s•. :l_e Downtown Develop a copy of the request from ..DC In the amount <br /> "? . 'ZDCNG Mr . Yourc stated that he resided at ?62 W. <br /> and nad been on the Mental Heath <br /> Soar~ for 6 ':ears , also was a member of <br /> the Mental :fealth Foundation . :dental Hea_ _n <br /> is not a 3oulder County institution; is ncn- <br /> orofit and t^e only way tile•, can :or.tinue <br /> their program is cy funds tney receive from <br /> various _: ties and the County. The,: have <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.