My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 01 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1984 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 01 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:52 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:14:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
1/3/1984
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1984 01 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
12/20/83 Page -2- <br /> Attorney Rautenstraus Advised that council has the right to approve <br /> the renewal; if council were going to con- <br /> sider not renewing the license he would ad- <br /> vise that a public hearing be held to make <br /> a determination. The renewal could be ap- <br /> proved by other action such as contacting <br /> the establishment and putting them on notice <br /> that any future violations of these problems <br /> would be cause for future suspension of their <br /> license. Another option would be that <br /> council renew the license and request the <br /> owner to be at the next council meeting to <br /> discuss this with him and advising him that <br /> continued violations would lead to suspension <br /> or non-renewal next year. <br /> Councilman Cussen requested that a letter <br /> be sent to the owners of council's concerns. <br /> He felt that there were a number of fights <br /> that had occured at the establishment and <br /> saw this as a concern located near the down- <br /> town area. The attitude of the owners seems <br /> to be noncaring or they would notify the <br /> Police Dept. of these incidents. Cussen <br /> then inquired if the license could be approved <br /> Public Hearing for a specific time contigent upon a public <br /> hearing. <br /> Rautenstraus advised that the license could <br /> be renewed for a shorter period of time based <br /> upon a public hearing. He would review the <br /> specific time the notice should be given be- <br /> fore a public hearing could be held; felt <br /> that 2 weeks would be sufficient. <br /> Director Leesman Advised that the viol.:tionâ– were on ordinance <br /> for failure to notify them. They had had <br /> numerous calls on disturbances, fights, few <br /> thefts. Some of them it was difficult to <br /> determine what the nature of the disturbance <br /> was because of the inability of officers to <br /> see what had cccured by the time the officers <br /> get there. Had reported incidents where <br /> they wiahcd parties ejected because of intoxi- <br /> cation. Leesman felt there were some cir- <br /> cumstances where the establishment was not <br /> . at fault - two people happened to meet there <br /> who had a disagreement and the establishment <br /> was not at fault. Sometimes when the officers <br /> arrive the parties had left and they don't <br /> wish to offer any information as to why the <br /> police were called or what had happened. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.