My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 01 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1984 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 01 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:52 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:14:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
1/3/1984
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1984 01 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
12/20/83 Page -4- <br /> TEMPORARY APPROVAL Councilman Cussen moved, Councilwoman Morris <br /> seconded that Waldo's be given a temporary <br /> approval of their renewal of their liquor <br /> license- after they have been notified by <br /> letter of a liquor license hearing, until <br /> January 3, 1984 at which time council will <br /> either make a decision to continue or deny <br /> renal. <br /> Councilman Cummings Commented if we have a problem in a bar and <br /> we can't make the rules, why go through the <br /> formality of a hearing? <br /> Attorney Rautenstraus advised that council <br /> could :rake the rules, the point is you can't <br /> make the rules until you give the owner spe- <br /> cific notice that you are going to discuss <br /> this with him. Rautenstraus further stated <br /> that if council's policy was to have a hear- <br /> ing every time on every liquor license re- <br /> newal then it would le appropriate to act <br /> on it without giving opecific notice. The <br /> policy of council has always beeen to renew <br /> a liquor license without a hearing, or <br /> without requiring the person to be here; there- <br /> fore if the policy is changed now and act <br /> without giving specific notice that's when <br /> you could be in trouble. <br /> Councilman Leary Commented that the policy has been to approve <br /> renewals without a hearing; but there has <br /> been no policy established that it would be <br /> inconsistent with disapproving a renewal <br /> without a hearing. <br /> Attorney Rautenstraus advised that the <br /> Case Law and the Liquor Code specifically <br /> implies that non-renewal or denial is not <br /> appropriate without a hearing. <br /> Councilman Leary commented since the renewal <br /> applications are sent to liquor establishments <br /> in ample time by the State Liquor Division, <br /> they should be required to submit them to <br /> council at least 6 weeks prior to their <br /> expiration date. <br /> Rautenstraus concurred; but stated <br /> Council did not set a consistent policy to <br /> deal with this. <br /> VOTE ON THE MOTION Question called for. 6 Ayes - 1 Nay. <br /> Councilman Cummings dissenting. Motion carried <br /> 6-1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.