My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 06 30
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1984 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 06 30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:53 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:26:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
6/30/1984
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1984 06 30
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i osky Mt1unytn CensaMarlp4 lne. <br /> 4280 East Evans Avenue.Suits 7•Denver CO 80222•(343)758.4532 <br /> Moss also located in Longmont and Estes Park,CO <br /> .tuns 26, 1984 <br /> Mr. Leon A. hurl <br /> City Administrator <br /> City of Louisville <br /> 749 Main Street <br /> Louisville, CO 80027 <br /> Deer Mr. WurT: <br /> The following explanation Is provided to help clarify the discrepancy between <br /> what Is now known to be the "actual" treatment capacity of the existing water <br /> system and what had been prsvlosuly addressed In the past as the treatment <br /> capacity of the existing system. <br /> The Improvements to Filter Plant 01 , handled by Bruns t Associates in 1971-72, <br /> identified the plant capacity at 5.0 MGO following the improvements they <br /> proposed. <br /> Subsequent analysis by RMC of the major coponents of the plant (filter beds, <br /> pipe size, etc.) to determine the hydraulic capacity of the plant identified <br /> that all major components were capable of 3.51' MGD hydraulic capacity. The <br /> scope of subsequent RKC projects did not necessitate a detailed analysis of <br /> treatment or hydraulic capacity of the plant. <br /> The operation of both Filter Plants /1 and 02 for the years 1980, 1981 , 1982 <br /> were analyzed in detail by RMC in 1983 to determine treatment efficiency; it <br /> was determined that at the current demand for 1980-82, the pretreatment <br /> systems were substantially Inadequate and would not be reliable for total <br /> system demands in excess of 3.0-3.5 MGD. Recommendations for improving the <br /> pretreatment systems were made and accepted and are currently nearing <br /> construction completion. <br /> With the aid of the "new" City staff It became apparent that there were some <br /> very real concerns as to the accuracy of past treated water accounting <br /> procedures which indicated that the assumed treatment capacity was substan- <br /> tially higher than the actual treatment capacities. <br /> When this discrepancy became very apparent in May 1984, the City's staff <br /> requested that RMC perform a detailed hydraulic analysis of the total <br /> treatment system. <br /> This analysis indicated that the hydraulic capacity of Filter Plant 01 as It <br /> is currently operated is substantially below 3.5 MGD but could be improved <br /> with relatively minor piping/pumping revisions or changes in operation of <br /> the system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.