My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 07 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1984 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 07 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:53 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:28:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
7/17/1984
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1984 07 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. Special Mettingy Ci Council <br /> June 30 , 1984 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Mike Savage, 464 Sumac Court. I personally don't buy into all the <br /> agruements presented here today. Council needs more information <br /> than they have here. Council should set up a compensatory fund for <br /> those who lose their lawns. Will this happen again in a couple of <br /> weeks if we can't conserve now? Take a hard look at planning for <br /> the City and not issue any permits or taps. <br /> Christine Roberts, 266 Hoover Ave. Many of Ay questions have been <br /> answered today, but this all stems from problems of growth. It <br /> is really the City Administrator and Public Works Dept. who are at <br /> fault, we should have been notified in May or before, when the problem <br /> was obvious. Put a mortarium on growth until all services can be <br /> served. No one seems to know yet what the full capacity of the treated <br /> water will be when the construction is completed. <br /> Everett Lush , 106 Madison. My grass has been In for about 2 weeks, <br /> and another week and it will be gone. <br /> David Wahl , 661 Mulberry St. I am willing to restrict my watering, <br /> but how about the businesses, restaurants , car washes , etc. Should <br /> they be restricted, or shut down on certain days? <br /> Larry Allen, 1954 Sunnyside Circle. Questioned the numbers presented. <br /> he quoted many percentages , and what about next year's safety factor? <br /> What are you going to do to prevent this from happening again? <br /> People are willing to conserve if they can see something constructive <br /> come out of finis meeting. The root cause is growth. Council con- <br /> sider having special meetings on growth plan so the town can know <br /> what is happening. <br /> Keith Seifert, 264 So. Carter Ave. City wide issue on growth at <br /> this time, should be put to a city wide vote. Examine closely the <br /> accountability of staff. If this had been a private business . some- <br /> one 's head would roll . Legal recourse to examine a contractor, <br /> tighten up contracts . <br /> Bill Seeder, 146 Jackson. Use better contractors . This is not a <br /> growth problem. This is strictly a contractor problem. <br /> Charlie DeBoogaard, 626 W. Lilac Ct. Like to encourage city council <br /> to pursue two further avenues; 1) get to the root of the problem, <br /> address the creditability problem. A head, or heads , need to roll . <br /> The consultants are partially to blame on this too. 2) City Council <br /> needs to figure out from the legal standpoint how we can try to limit <br /> the number of building permits and water taps. I have no problem <br /> with water restrictions and the plan developed by Public Works Dept. <br /> are fair, we could water every 4 days . But don 't shut every thing <br /> off again , that is too drastic. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.