Laserfiche WebLink
to bring them more into conformance with the <br /> recommendation of ICNO. The affect on an average <br /> 1250 s.f. home would be an increase in fees from <br /> $090.00 to 8913.7$ or a 2.70 increase for <br /> residential and approximately a 2.91 for retail <br /> building of 1,000 f.t. The fees for a 50,000 s.f. <br /> office building would actually drop nearly 150. <br /> Since most building in Louisville is residential <br /> and retail, Maau*sh does not anticipate any <br /> significant changes in total fee receipts. <br /> Mayor Pauson asked if there was anyone wishing to <br /> speak in favor of or in opposition to this <br /> Ordinance. Hone. <br /> Mayor Tauson closed the public bearing and asked <br /> for a motion. <br /> Mohr moved that Ordinance 0193 be adopted. <br /> Scarp*lla seconded. Sy Roll Call Vat*, Ordinance <br /> 0895 was adopted unanimously. <br /> OGDIt(& $CE $896 - ANNEXATION REQUEST - PIMC*TL, JOSIPI AND ?ROUT' - <br /> PUSLIC HEARING Aautenstraus read by title only Ordinance 0999. <br /> An Ordinance annexing to the City of Louisville, <br /> Colorado, a parcel of approximately 22.27 acres <br /> located along what is known as Spruce Lane, in <br /> Section $ which is owned by Spruce Street Piecbtl, <br /> Limited, Spruce Street Joseph, Limited, and <br /> Jonathan Prouty." Publication and notice of <br /> public bearing were established. <br /> Mayor Pauson opened the public hearing. <br /> Wanush outlined the annexation request wherein the <br /> owners are requesting IR Zoning. The property is <br /> located north and south of Nest Spruce Street and <br /> generally west of the Goodhue Ditch within the <br /> area known as the Spruce Lane neighborhood. Jon <br /> Prouty and Spruce Street Joseph Ltd. partnership <br /> are the owners of the 22.5 acre parcel of ground <br /> wbi' b is currently in the County and toned <br /> Suburban Residential. The Planning Commission <br /> held a public bearing concerning this on May 13, <br /> 1986 and recommend annexation with the conditions <br /> present to Council at the first reading on May <br /> 20, 1981. The first condition required the <br /> developer to provide an up-front payment of <br /> $33,950 to cover deficit water requirements and <br /> the 4th condition required that the existing units <br /> be charged a service expansion fee of 12.25 per <br /> square foot up to a maximum of 15,000 per unit. <br /> Planning Commission determined that the property <br /> must be developed as a POD. <br /> • <br /> 5 <br />