Laserfiche WebLink
The School District is agreeing to provide up to <br /> $50,000 for work related to drainage. Hide for <br /> the drainage project will be in next month, <br /> according to Share. Mohr suggested that if this <br /> is a project which might be billed out at a later <br /> date, that language be included within the <br /> agreement to cover possible price increases. <br /> Anderson expressed concern with the two figures <br /> used within the language of the Agreement <br /> concerning cessation occurring within 25 years of <br /> the original opening date of a school building, <br /> and the deeding of the property back to the City <br /> in the event that the School District does not use <br /> the property for a school site within eight (0) <br /> years of the Agreement date. * What is the magic <br /> in those two numbers," Anderson asked. Wanush <br /> felt that they weren't particularly significant <br /> and could probably be negotiated. Anderson asked <br /> that staff see if those numbers couldn't be <br /> "tightened" somewhat. <br /> Szymanski asked what constitutes a school related <br /> use as stated in Section 10.7. Wanush stated that <br /> he would have that clarified. <br /> In referring to Section 10.7, Anderson stated that <br /> only having 90 days prior written notice to the <br /> City with the right of first refusal to purchase <br /> shall terminate 90 days after the day the School <br /> District gives notice` isn't a long enough period <br /> to carry out the proper City of Louisville budge- <br /> tary process necessary to perform in terms of a <br /> closing should the City decide to purchase the <br /> facility. Staff will negotiate a longer term or <br /> structure the process to better accommodate the <br /> City's budgetary procedures. <br /> Mayor Paulson moved that staff finalise the <br /> agreement with the stated amendments for final <br /> Council approval . Scarpella seconded. Unanimous. <br /> MURAL - COAL C ER <br /> RANCH Anderson asked to be excused from the proceedings <br /> on this issue as Mr. Bellock is a client of <br /> Anderson's. <br /> Sackett asked also to be excused due to his <br /> relationship with Boulder Memorial Hospital and <br /> the development of a health center in close proxi- <br /> mity to the proposed Coal Creek Ranch site. Mayor <br /> Pausan asked that he remain as his interest was <br /> not monetary in nature and that if he so chose, he <br /> could refrain from commenting on the proposal. <br /> 3 <br />